From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>,
Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: refactor folio_undo_large_rmappable()
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 21:03:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240521130315.46072-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
Folios of order <= 1 are not in deferred list, the check of order
is added into folio_undo_large_rmappable() from commit 8897277acfef
("mm: support order-1 folios in the page cache"), but there is a
repeated check for small folio (order 0) during each call of the
folio_undo_large_rmappable(), so only keep folio_order() check
inside the function.
In addition, move all the checks into header file to save a function
call for non-large-rmappable or empty deferred_list folio.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
v2:
- update changelog, per Lance and Vishal
mm/huge_memory.c | 13 +------------
mm/internal.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
mm/memcontrol.c | 3 +--
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +--
mm/swap.c | 8 ++------
mm/vmscan.c | 8 ++------
6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 317de2afd371..f9dbdc878136 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3182,22 +3182,11 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
return ret;
}
-void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio)
+void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio)
{
struct deferred_split *ds_queue;
unsigned long flags;
- if (folio_order(folio) <= 1)
- return;
-
- /*
- * At this point, there is no one trying to add the folio to
- * deferred_list. If folio is not in deferred_list, it's safe
- * to check without acquiring the split_queue_lock.
- */
- if (data_race(list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)))
- return;
-
ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio);
spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index b2c75b12014e..447171d171ce 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -605,7 +605,22 @@ static inline void folio_set_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order)
#endif
}
-void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio);
+void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio);
+static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * At this point, there is no one trying to add the folio to
+ * deferred_list. If folio is not in deferred_list, it's safe
+ * to check without acquiring the split_queue_lock.
+ */
+ if (data_race(list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)))
+ return;
+
+ __folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
+}
static inline struct folio *page_rmappable_folio(struct page *page)
{
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f85925da5687..1b80d2660c6e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -7873,8 +7873,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
* In addition, the old folio is about to be freed after migration, so
* removing from the split queue a bit earlier seems reasonable.
*/
- if (folio_test_large(old) && folio_test_large_rmappable(old))
- folio_undo_large_rmappable(old);
+ folio_undo_large_rmappable(old);
old->memcg_data = 0;
}
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index cd584aace6bf..b1e3eb5787de 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2645,8 +2645,7 @@ void free_unref_folios(struct folio_batch *folios)
unsigned long pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
unsigned int order = folio_order(folio);
- if (order > 0 && folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
- folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
+ folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
if (!free_pages_prepare(&folio->page, order))
continue;
/*
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 67786cb77130..dc205bdfbbd4 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ void __folio_put(struct folio *folio)
}
page_cache_release(folio);
- if (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
- folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
+ folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
mem_cgroup_uncharge(folio);
free_unref_page(&folio->page, folio_order(folio));
}
@@ -1002,10 +1001,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs)
free_huge_folio(folio);
continue;
}
- if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
- folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
- folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
-
+ folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
__page_cache_release(folio, &lruvec, &flags);
if (j != i)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 6981a71c8ef0..615d2422d0e4 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1454,9 +1454,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
*/
nr_reclaimed += nr_pages;
- if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
- folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
- folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
+ folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) {
mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
try_to_unmap_flush();
@@ -1863,9 +1861,7 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
if (unlikely(folio_put_testzero(folio))) {
__folio_clear_lru_flags(folio);
- if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
- folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
- folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
+ folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) {
spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 13:03 Kefeng Wang [this message]
2024-05-21 20:21 ` Vishal Moola
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240521130315.46072-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox