From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F8DC04FFE for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 07:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 23C1B6B0168; Sat, 11 May 2024 03:04:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1E8E46B0169; Sat, 11 May 2024 03:04:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0B10E6B016A; Sat, 11 May 2024 03:04:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15196B0168 for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 03:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB521618F2 for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 07:04:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82105227876.24.8950EF4 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176B814001F for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 07:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=CDHxJFRu; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.8 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1715411096; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=qfuThGDGl3pzEhutRq/A5avTd8fO4jRVxYCeL2hGLTI=; b=LGfTU5u2Lsz4VfoLQJVm8aWt170F/CriC49J8M+4hAKeSiDfezkvctHd+RVQGSE/GC61JA zlyQ1XVDBB4IZ6Q391oL+48tlqNXWS++jpB7F2ezchSU9HPmoybHpA9m2mLTOKuVIqs96b pgRvyXTyFb5gM0ybidQY61opeahbiA8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=CDHxJFRu; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.8 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1715411096; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=4VMOzoju9UNrqEZNdDLjTq4CPjoQc4eqYjyxBrI/ooda0KFBSbQ7KrP0GEn1duwpMf9Qmg OZ6M1CRh7XuGlw+Yu/e5HqBVTvDAENEk7+J039sAx1+6aDdPv1DckI15b7/218Bto9dmWR xQitum11a/YcBbGTVbvX3fQJn6d+uPI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715411096; x=1746947096; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Yiz0h+TJ4V6Llm1CfE0BJLB5v4VhySio+M1awKypBAA=; b=CDHxJFRu03qvutUudrVHv7YNrU80OJqRuwkY670E5sbEhh6J2L5giikl HwSZdiu8P+dmgehDjxZGdI3PFwXbcKxcQUav8xuv2Y7BkFB+W58pQEuEP g3jppDL7Hy1/phpunrblQ+3Be4l3cswhO6m13rCRAdabNMoLkzyASSAO+ X0W4dUidrRZk85J4SUFn1Z+1Myp0nBmj3tHFFAAUgaPd1cwJZKczsWTpZ M2vXhCR0DJktP2h9UEoBFsA+BTkQYXpH2Y/etNMbSEut+7726B3rDaW7q 7taSRH0ZAexznXJAkvjySWZs34aQaOz+G9Yd7W5VFXiCb5SbTZkrpFRHD g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RNXaYgmoS+mjLP12eHnhUg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: JtndPWlhSDK0qDbk7g4Qtw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11069"; a="28925814" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,153,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="28925814" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2024 00:04:54 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yOylc/n3QNSnm1GO/I4eZg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pnGRZh0IQk6cjN4ddyq4KQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,153,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="29958479" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f8b243fe6e68) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2024 00:04:52 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f8b243fe6e68 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s5gmn-00073X-0n; Sat, 11 May 2024 07:04:49 +0000 Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 15:04:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: hare@kernel.org, Andrew Morton Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Matthew Wilcox , Pankaj Raghav , Luis Chamberlain , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes Message-ID: <202405111438.WaVytRae-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240510102906.51844-5-hare@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240510102906.51844-5-hare@kernel.org> X-Stat-Signature: wmt97967wsr5znr7p7psfzbu4xrryqbh X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 176B814001F X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1715411095-727392 X-HE-Meta: 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 9oY8V2+f Ztrsvi7lTohnIZH91b9FeqtM7Hva8duh9ge1hJ3F8phKeeZy79zD5vcW0U6Zbr2Hk+xHo1towh08Sl5ZNseED53MdcniAwmF/3r9DOi8t0UEcnie4or50rkOiVk2Wl4l/ALjOpWnKW+BpnH2ZT4ONXwGEwSyGc05XlKQsOp9mEb+TG7FtQK2BravOZJKuH21Iy62BtilJQran7AfxMm4EWenA0G4dkZutK/E7BX574ZbCIlKpqDG5dz30th/FE9hVCsMNHAugWaQfr2ZdQUvWuTbwIumO+PP3u4p12aoUpesFj8yicyg6JLeVP38JIdsCqVhF2+BDJN3JkvjUOIszBe4kigLasZlkTI67qSWJzFpAqII= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.9-rc7] [cannot apply to next-20240510] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/hare-kernel-org/fs-mpage-use-blocks_per_folio-instead-of-blocks_per_page/20240510-183146 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240510102906.51844-5-hare%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 4/5] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240511/202405111438.WaVytRae-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240511/202405111438.WaVytRae-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405111438.WaVytRae-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> block/bdev.c:145:2: error: call to undeclared function 'mapping_set_folio_min_order'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 145 | mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, | ^ block/bdev.c:163:3: error: call to undeclared function 'mapping_set_folio_min_order'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 163 | mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, | ^ 2 errors generated. vim +/mapping_set_folio_min_order +145 block/bdev.c 133 134 static void set_init_blocksize(struct block_device *bdev) 135 { 136 unsigned int bsize = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev); 137 loff_t size = i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode); 138 139 while (bsize < PAGE_SIZE) { 140 if (size & bsize) 141 break; 142 bsize <<= 1; 143 } 144 bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits = blksize_bits(bsize); > 145 mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, 146 get_order(bsize)); 147 } 148 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki