From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Shivansh Vij <shivanshvij@outlook.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/5] arm64/mm: Add uffd write-protect support
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:43:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240419074344.2643212-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419074344.2643212-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Let's use the newly-free PTE SW bit (58) to add support for uffd-wp.
The standard handlers are implemented for set/test/clear for both pte
and pmd. Additionally we must also track the uffd-wp state as a pte swp
bit, so use a free swap entry pte bit (3).
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 8 ++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 7b11c98b3e84..763e221f2169 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ config ARM64
select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
select HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR if USERFAULTFD
+ select HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP if USERFAULTFD
select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_NMI_SUPPORT
select HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
index ef952d69fd04..f1e1f6306e03 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
@@ -20,6 +20,14 @@
#define PTE_DEVMAP (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 57)
#define PTE_PROT_NONE (PTE_UXN) /* Reuse PTE_UXN; only when !PTE_VALID */
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
+#define PTE_UFFD_WP (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 58) /* uffd-wp tracking */
+#define PTE_SWP_UFFD_WP (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 3) /* only for swp ptes */
+#else
+#define PTE_UFFD_WP (_AT(pteval_t, 0))
+#define PTE_SWP_UFFD_WP (_AT(pteval_t, 0))
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP */
+
/*
* This bit indicates that the entry is present i.e. pmd_page()
* still points to a valid huge page in memory even if the pmd
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 23aabff4fa6f..3f4748741fdb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -271,6 +271,34 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkdevmap(pte_t pte)
return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DEVMAP | PTE_SPECIAL));
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
+static inline int pte_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+ bool wp = !!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_UFFD_WP);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
+ /*
+ * Having write bit for wr-protect-marked present ptes is fatal, because
+ * it means the uffd-wp bit will be ignored and write will just go
+ * through. See comment in x86 implementation.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(wp && pte_write(pte));
+#endif
+
+ return wp;
+}
+
+static inline pte_t pte_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return pte_wrprotect(set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_UFFD_WP)));
+}
+
+static inline pte_t pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_UFFD_WP));
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP */
+
static inline void __set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*ptep, pte);
@@ -463,6 +491,23 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SWP_UFFD_WP));
+}
+
+static inline int pte_swp_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return !!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_SWP_UFFD_WP);
+}
+
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SWP_UFFD_WP));
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
/*
* See the comment in include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -508,6 +553,15 @@ static inline int pmd_trans_huge(pmd_t pmd)
#define pmd_mkclean(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkclean(pmd_pte(pmd)))
#define pmd_mkdirty(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkdirty(pmd_pte(pmd)))
#define pmd_mkyoung(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkyoung(pmd_pte(pmd)))
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
+#define pmd_uffd_wp(pmd) pte_uffd_wp(pmd_pte(pmd))
+#define pmd_mkuffd_wp(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkuffd_wp(pmd_pte(pmd)))
+#define pmd_clear_uffd_wp(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_clear_uffd_wp(pmd_pte(pmd)))
+#define pmd_swp_uffd_wp(pmd) pte_swp_uffd_wp(pmd_pte(pmd))
+#define pmd_swp_mkuffd_wp(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(pmd_pte(pmd)))
+#define pmd_swp_clear_uffd_wp(pmd) \
+ pte_pmd(pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(pmd_pte(pmd)))
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP */
static inline pmd_t pmd_mkinvalid(pmd_t pmd)
{
@@ -1248,6 +1302,7 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* Encode and decode a swap entry:
* bits 0-1: present (must be zero)
* bits 2: remember PG_anon_exclusive
+ * bit 3: remember uffd-wp state
* bits 4-53: swap offset
* bit 54: PTE_PROT_NONE (overlays PTE_UXN) (must be zero)
* bits 55-59: swap type
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 7:43 [PATCH v1 0/5] arm64/mm: uffd write-protect and soft-dirty tracking Ryan Roberts
2024-04-19 7:43 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] arm64/mm: Move PTE_PROT_NONE and PMD_PRESENT_INVALID Ryan Roberts
2024-04-19 7:43 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-04-19 7:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] arm64/mm: Add soft-dirty page tracking support Ryan Roberts
2024-04-19 7:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] selftests/mm: Enable soft-dirty tests on arm64 Ryan Roberts
2024-04-19 7:43 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] selftests/mm: soft-dirty should fail if a testcase fails Ryan Roberts
2024-04-22 9:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-23 8:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-23 8:44 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-24 10:40 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-19 7:47 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] arm64/mm: uffd write-protect and soft-dirty tracking Ryan Roberts
2024-04-19 8:19 ` Shivansh Vij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240419074344.2643212-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=shivanshvij@outlook.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox