From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: mm: restore settings from only parent process
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:52:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240418125250.GA2941398@e124191.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314094045.157149-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Hi again,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:40:45PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> The atexit() is called from parent process as well as forked processes.
> Hence the child restores the settings at exit while the parent is still
> executing. Fix this by checking pid of atexit() calling process and only
> restore THP number from parent process.
>
> Fixes: c23ea61726d5 ("selftests/mm: protection_keys: save/restore nr_hugepages settings")
> Tested-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
> index f822ae31af22e..374a308174d2b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -1745,9 +1745,12 @@ void pkey_setup_shadow(void)
> shadow_pkey_reg = __read_pkey_reg();
> }
>
> +pid_t parent_pid;
> +
> void restore_settings_atexit(void)
> {
> - cat_into_file(buf, "/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages");
> + if (parent_pid == getpid())
> + cat_into_file(buf, "/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages");
> }
>
> void save_settings(void)
> @@ -1773,6 +1776,7 @@ void save_settings(void)
> exit(__LINE__);
> }
>
> + parent_pid = getpid();
> atexit(restore_settings_atexit);
> close(fd);
> }
After more testing, this is not actually enough. It passes sometimes, which is
why I gave my Tested-by, but it can still fail the same way as I originally
said.
assert() at protection_keys.c::812 test_nr: 19 iteration: 1
running abort_hooks()...
errno at assert: 12
I think the parent process needs to wait for all it's child processes (recursively).
This is due to the test_pkey_alloc_exhaust() calling become_child(), where it
exits, and that exit may be from the original PID.
Thanks,
Joey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 9:40 Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-18 12:52 ` Joey Gouly [this message]
2024-04-18 17:25 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240418125250.GA2941398@e124191.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox