From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5D3C4345F for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 148FF6B0087; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0D0B46B0088; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:55:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E8C5C6B0089; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A196B0087 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE691C0B61 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:55:36 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82015391472.04.AD864C4 Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com (mail-ej1-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0CB80016 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=k+F11z6Z; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of richard.weiyang@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=richard.weiyang@gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1713272134; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=b/kA8nccD2I6UbJql9NxY719P+XVYeJcjhgNkmbDfWU=; b=de4ICCyXagibgbhmthYLtJ4G4CrOjZd5jFN2GCnBisVkzTY28kteZcdm8hbq6RWyu7edeS fI+S0y85VGevi+znIL16/9mtTtL+potWbelLMMGC35IkVtk2SNB5Fj6fvkZZX3FBMl3O2G ZWZR75VtDkyEIEyYXp2OaDNgmlqnpYg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=k+F11z6Z; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of richard.weiyang@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=richard.weiyang@gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1713272134; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OM3PMAngcvRi88uJKC3c+gHxNwjKum6gAPr0wJTubvMSjfuZUmDDeAZMqBD/XYazd9soDt 9k1ZRfAod/G6AT2s/+mUAQn9n37goFb8cqEcPdmSWrnMLqRZxiZCxdqvpSPmPH7kJbMLIL kQG+S5cVGAp3XFN8WzlqDyKqX+94Hlg= Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a4702457ccbso547137266b.3 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:55:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713272133; x=1713876933; darn=kvack.org; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=b/kA8nccD2I6UbJql9NxY719P+XVYeJcjhgNkmbDfWU=; b=k+F11z6ZrRmLTZvz68M8MEEv7h5tr7RpN89t7uQ5B6bsiUDo2i9HgrGs5Ax9GrMjdU EL/7dYE/sZjW/J4tgwLderDfUOgO/qTFNq3YNixMovg84uMaM+X80HxSWK9rXhF6dYqI u8GC3nKEy2MB4QUChHOeGaqFiGj3exJDekpMTAabxvBtHkVPe42G+NrO5rxiJWlqYdev DgXY2FWV+pcqC2muVCs9EuBflF3NLbuReJNO3uamlQqdjf0kHLLESVYOM77+Nvm+6iD6 x7/bl6dUG8kGvJzBEpoUErEAo1lNv0T498ER7kvJ98DLuZocEr27+sn1/bNwr9Ul3tp6 eMvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713272133; x=1713876933; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=b/kA8nccD2I6UbJql9NxY719P+XVYeJcjhgNkmbDfWU=; b=TDUAaH9wB+fJbTGA0bVpXWF2/zKkRzmC2xUt+9tOafqk6TvGFGC59fZOmYDxg/t4+9 CqSW85BVp1EqXGwmQaCMmb7y8lAEJYuG+ly6eZz0gpNkjIT/bEr/Es3pfNGZ+mNzybgK f7IOHpSS4MdQ0F1W6kv2AB/3xFv8CxjGZ0bg7zI9B0kpJ0v+NKFeNjMA4aieUJjMx91C jQSppF6JWdBQ7O0yILRuE8eAZiW4A7ucXFL7di9gCKyWTaHVjYkXD9BlStePdarE5GKC FoOwNLkYdtcBTLvA5LTuiuYevmNroOUwjix3i5nnwa/jzFOsQ5aNH3zoQfxuz7Ow9rpF nq4w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXQfcgADh3Ul/LslP0SKOUORRLds+BsZZT2+/2Qut93aiYJYd7Kh2sh+JXqS23gAyo1qHmZ8zJ2acgMKuK9dlRmmRs= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyeIwAZAs99Kv1KmdemEmGqGlubMq0DYjVYVNEALLYw4pRMSA7x fMrHJhXskekAQtfMlEIszsja1Olz8iSa3B5oezvrewazteP22zxe X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGDwVYhRns/2BageD3QCNptI5k5PthxYPuIIUxwqeohjhKPALAfy3DeVG50ONkwDvpI4UNyAw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9705:b0:a52:4403:9c2 with SMTP id jg5-20020a170907970500b00a52440309c2mr7592410ejc.14.1713272132620; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wp20-20020a170907061400b00a5226f9542dsm6400851ejb.27.2024.04.16.05.55.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:55:31 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Wei Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] memblock tests: add the 129th memory block at all possible position Message-ID: <20240416125531.v7we4lo222pgyr2b@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20240414004531.6601-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> <20240414004531.6601-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: mmu1m1r7wha3stgiyg1jywc5oauk3kzn X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6F0CB80016 X-HE-Tag: 1713272134-596024 X-HE-Meta: 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 aD2OVi45 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.163712, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:19:42PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: >On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 12:45:27AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >> After previous change, we may double the array based on the position of >> the new range. >> >> Let's make sure the 129th memory block would double the size correctly >> at all possible position. > >Rather than rewrite an existing test, just add a new one. Ok, will add a new one for this. >Besides, it would be more interesting to test additions to >memblock.reserved and a mix of memblock_add() and memblock_reserve() that >will require resizing the memblock arrays. I don't get this very clearly. Would you mind give more hint? > >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > >-- >Sincerely yours, >Mike. -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me