linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: tmgross@umich.edu
Cc: a.hindborg@samsung.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alex.gaynor@gmail.com,  aliceryhl@google.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	arve@android.com, benno.lossin@proton.me,
	 bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	brauner@kernel.org,  cmllamas@google.com, gary@garyguo.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,  joel@joelfernandes.org,
	keescook@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org, maco@android.com, ojeda@kernel.org,
	 rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	tkjos@android.com,  viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, wedsonaf@gmail.com,
	willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] rust: uaccess: add typed accessors for userspace pointers
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:53:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240416095330.1108574-1-aliceryhl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALNs47vkeAeU5jGk2AV_w0oRfPCiXzcWTGO_bauCnSsqQTX-iA@mail.gmail.com>

Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 3:15 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add safe methods for reading and writing Rust values to and from
>> userspace pointers.
>>
>> The C methods for copying to/from userspace use a function called
>> `check_object_size` to verify that the kernel pointer is not dangling.
>> However, this check is skipped when the length is a compile-time
>> constant, with the assumption that such cases trivially have a correct
>> kernel pointer.
>>
>> In this patch, we apply the same optimization to the typed accessors.
>> For both methods, the size of the operation is known at compile time to
>> be size_of of the type being read or written. Since the C side doesn't
>> provide a variant that skips only this check, we create custom helpers
>> for this purpose.
>>
>> The majority of reads and writes to userspace pointers in the Rust
>> Binder driver uses these accessor methods. Benchmarking has found that
>> skipping the `check_object_size` check makes a big difference for the
>> cases being skipped here. (And that the check doesn't make a difference
>> for the cases that use the raw read/write methods.)
>>
>> This code is based on something that was originally written by Wedson on
>> the old rust branch. It was modified by Alice to skip the
>> `check_object_size` check, and to update various comments, including the
>> notes about kernel pointers in `WritableToBytes`.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
>> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> 
> Couple of docs nits but this looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>

Thanks for taking a look!

>> +/// Types for which any bit pattern is valid.
>> +///
>> +/// Not all types are valid for all values. For example, a `bool` must be either zero or one, so
>> +/// reading arbitrary bytes into something that contains a `bool` is not okay.
>> +///
>> +/// It's okay for the type to have padding, as initializing those bytes has no effect.
>> +///
>> +/// # Safety
>> +///
>> +/// All bit-patterns must be valid for this type.
>> +pub unsafe trait FromBytes {}
> 
> No `UnsafeCell` is also a requirement in zerocopy/bytemuck

I can add that requirement.

>> +/// Types that can be viewed as an immutable slice of initialized bytes.
>> +///
>> +/// If a struct implements this trait, then it is okay to copy it byte-for-byte to userspace. This
>> +/// means that it should not have any padding, as padding bytes are uninitialized. Reading
>> +/// uninitialized memory is not just undefined behavior, it may even lead to leaking sensitive
>> +/// information on the stack to userspace.
>> +///
>> +/// The struct should also not hold kernel pointers, as kernel pointer addresses are also considered
>> +/// sensitive. However, leaking kernel pointers is not considered undefined behavior by Rust, so
>> +/// this is a correctness requirement, but not a safety requirement.
> 
> I don't think mentions of userspace are relevant here since the trait
> is more general. Maybe a `# Interfacing with userspace` section if
> there is enough relevant information.

I think it is relevant. It is the main purpose of the trait right now,
and it is also part of the justification for why the rules are what they
are.

>> +/// # Safety
>> +///
>> +/// Values of this type may not contain any uninitialized bytes.
> 
> No UnsafeCell

Will add.

>> +pub unsafe trait AsBytes {}
> 
>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs b/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs
>> index c97029cdeba1..e3953eec61a3 100644
>> --- a/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs
>> +++ b/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs
>> @@ -4,10 +4,15 @@
>>  //!
>>  //! C header: [`include/linux/uaccess.h`](srctree/include/linux/uaccess.h)
>>
>> -use crate::{bindings, error::code::*, error::Result};
>> +use crate::{
>> +    bindings,
>> +    error::code::*,
>> +    error::Result,
>> +    types::{AsBytes, FromBytes},
>> +};
>>  use alloc::vec::Vec;
>>  use core::ffi::{c_ulong, c_void};
>> -use core::mem::MaybeUninit;
>> +use core::mem::{size_of, MaybeUninit};
>>
>>  /// A pointer to an area in userspace memory, which can be either read-only or read-write.
>>  ///
>> @@ -238,6 +243,38 @@ pub fn read_slice(&mut self, out: &mut [u8]) -> Result {
>>          self.read_raw(out)
>>      }
>>
>> +    /// Reads a value of the specified type.
>> +    ///
>> +    /// Fails with `EFAULT` if the read encounters a page fault.
>> +    pub fn read<T: FromBytes>(&mut self) -> Result<T> {
>> [...]
>> +    /// Writes the provided Rust value to this userspace pointer.
>> +    ///
>> +    /// Fails with `EFAULT` if the write encounters a page fault.
>> +    pub fn write<T: AsBytes>(&mut self, value: &T) -> Result {
> 
> Read & write could use an example if you are up for it

I may or may not add an example.

Alice


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15  7:13 [PATCH v5 0/4] Memory management patches needed by Rust Binder Alice Ryhl
2024-04-15  7:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] rust: uaccess: add userspace pointers Alice Ryhl
2024-04-15  9:36   ` Benno Lossin
2024-04-15  9:44     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-15  9:51       ` Benno Lossin
2024-04-15 21:53   ` Boqun Feng
2024-04-16  9:53     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-21 18:08       ` David Laight
2024-04-21 18:37         ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-21 19:48           ` David Laight
2024-04-22  6:31             ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-16  5:05   ` Trevor Gross
2024-04-16  9:53     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-17 14:28   ` Gary Guo
2024-04-17 14:40     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-17 15:27       ` Benno Lossin
2024-04-17 15:35         ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-15  7:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] uaccess: always export _copy_[from|to]_user with CONFIG_RUST Alice Ryhl
2024-04-15 23:05   ` Kees Cook
2024-04-16  9:57     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-15  7:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] rust: uaccess: add typed accessors for userspace pointers Alice Ryhl
2024-04-16  5:53   ` Trevor Gross
2024-04-16  9:53     ` Alice Ryhl [this message]
2024-04-15  7:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] rust: add abstraction for `struct page` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-15  8:10   ` Andreas Hindborg
2024-04-15  9:54   ` Benno Lossin
2024-04-16  5:40   ` Trevor Gross
2024-04-16  9:53     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-04-16 17:47       ` Trevor Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240416095330.1108574-1-aliceryhl@google.com \
    --to=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox