From: <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
To: <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>, <mhocko@kernel.org>,
<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <david@redhat.com>
Cc: <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>, <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
<muchun.song@linux.dev>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>,
<xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>, <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>,
<lu.zhongjun@zte.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: thp: makes the memcg THP deferred split shrinker aware of
node_id
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:11:23 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240415111123924s9IbQkgHF8S4yZv4su8LI@zte.com.cn> (raw)
From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
Since commit 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker
memcg aware"), the THP deferred split queue is per memcg but not
per mem_cgroup_per_node. This has two aspects of impact:
Impact1: for kswapd reclaim
=====================
kswapd
balance_pgdat
kswapd_shrink_node
shrink_node(pgdat, sc);
shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg...);
the parameter "pgdat->node_id" does not take effectct for
THP deferred_split_shrinker, as the deferred_split_queue of
specified memcg is not for a certain numa node but for all the nodes.
We want to makes the memcg THP deferred split shrinker aware of
node_id.
Impact2: thp-deferred_split shrinker debugfs interface
=========================================
for the "count" file:
<cgroup inode id> <objects on node 0> <objects on node 1>
the output is acctually the sum of all numa nodes.
for the "scan" file:
<cgroup inode id> <numa id> <number of objects to scan>
Also the "numa id" input does not take effect here.
This patch makes memcg deferred_split_queue per mem_cgroup_per_node
so try to conform to semantic logic.
Reviewed-by: Lu Zhongjun <lu.zhongjun@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
Cc: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 7 +++----
mm/huge_memory.c | 6 +++---
mm/memcontrol.c | 11 +++++------
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 394fd0a887ae..7282861d5a5d 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
bool on_tree;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg; /* Back pointer, we cannot */
/* use container_of */
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+ struct deferred_split deferred_split_queue;
+#endif
};
struct mem_cgroup_threshold {
@@ -327,10 +330,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
struct list_head event_list;
spinlock_t event_list_lock;
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
- struct deferred_split deferred_split_queue;
-#endif
-
#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN_WALKS_MMU
/* per-memcg mm_struct list */
struct lru_gen_mm_list mm_list;
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 9859aa4f7553..338d071070a6 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ struct deferred_split *get_deferred_split_queue(struct folio *folio)
struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(folio_nid(folio));
if (memcg)
- return &memcg->deferred_split_queue;
+ return &memcg->nodeinfo[pgdat->node_id]->deferred_split_queue;
else
return &pgdat->deferred_split_queue;
}
@@ -3305,7 +3305,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
if (sc->memcg)
- ds_queue = &sc->memcg->deferred_split_queue;
+ ds_queue = &sc->memcg->nodeinfo[sc->nid]->deferred_split_queue;
#endif
return READ_ONCE(ds_queue->split_queue_len);
}
@@ -3322,7 +3322,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
if (sc->memcg)
- ds_queue = &sc->memcg->deferred_split_queue;
+ ds_queue = &sc->memcg->nodeinfo[sc->nid]->deferred_split_queue;
#endif
spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index fabce2b50c69..cdf9f5fa3b8e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5445,7 +5445,11 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
kfree(pn);
return 1;
}
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+ spin_lock_init(&pn->deferred_split_queue.split_queue_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pn->deferred_split_queue.split_queue);
+ pn->deferred_split_queue.split_queue_len = 0;
+#endif
lruvec_init(&pn->lruvec);
pn->memcg = memcg;
@@ -5545,11 +5549,6 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(struct mem_cgroup *parent)
for (i = 0; i < MEMCG_CGWB_FRN_CNT; i++)
memcg->cgwb_frn[i].done =
__WB_COMPLETION_INIT(&memcg_cgwb_frn_waitq);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
- spin_lock_init(&memcg->deferred_split_queue.split_queue_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->deferred_split_queue.split_queue);
- memcg->deferred_split_queue.split_queue_len = 0;
#endif
lru_gen_init_memcg(memcg);
return memcg;
--
2.15.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 3:11 xu.xin16 [this message]
2024-04-15 3:29 ` Barry Song
2024-04-15 18:31 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240415111123924s9IbQkgHF8S4yZv4su8LI@zte.com.cn \
--to=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lu.zhongjun@zte.com.cn \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox