From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH rfc 0/3] mm: allow more high-order pages stored on PCP lists
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:12:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240415081220.3246839-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
Both the file pages and anonymous pages support large folio, high-order
pages except PMD_ORDER will also be allocated frequently which could
increase the zone lock contention, allow high-order pages on pcp lists
could reduce the big zone lock contention, but as commit 44042b449872
("mm/page_alloc: allow high-order pages to be stored on the per-cpu lists")
pointed, it may not win in all the scenes, add a new control sysfs to
enable or disable specified high-order pages stored on PCP lists, the order
(PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, PMD_ORDER) won't be stored on PCP list by default.
With perf lock tools, the lock contention from will-it-scale page_fault1
(with 90 tasks run 10s, hugepage-2048KB never, hugepage-64K always) show
below(only care about zone spinlock and pcp spinlock),
Without patches,
contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
713 4.64 ms 74.37 us 6.51 us spinlock __alloc_pages+0x23c
With patches,
contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
2 25.66 us 16.31 us 12.83 us spinlock rmqueue_pcplist+0x2b0
Similar results on shell8 from unixbench,
Without patches,
4942 901.09 ms 1.31 ms 182.33 us spinlock __alloc_pages+0x23c
1556 298.76 ms 1.23 ms 192.01 us spinlock rmqueue_pcplist+0x2b0
991 182.73 ms 879.80 us 184.39 us spinlock rmqueue_pcplist+0x2b0
With patches,
contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
988 187.63 ms 855.18 us 189.91 us spinlock rmqueue_pcplist+0x2b0
505 88.99 ms 793.27 us 176.21 us spinlock rmqueue_pcplist+0x2b0
The Benchmarks Score shows a little improvoment(0.28%) from shell8, but the
zone lock from __alloc_pages() disappeared.
Kefeng Wang (3):
mm: prepare more high-order pages to be stored on the per-cpu lists
mm: add control to allow specified high-order pages stored on PCP list
mm: pcp: show each order page count
Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst | 11 ++++
include/linux/gfp.h | 1 +
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 1 +
include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++-
include/linux/vmstat.h | 19 ++++++
mm/Kconfig.debug | 8 +++
mm/huge_memory.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 30 +++++++--
mm/vmstat.c | 16 +++++
9 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 8:12 Kefeng Wang [this message]
2024-04-15 8:12 ` [PATCH rfc 1/3] mm: prepare more high-order pages to be stored on the per-cpu lists Kefeng Wang
2024-04-15 11:41 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-15 12:25 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-04-15 8:12 ` [PATCH rfc 2/3] mm: add control to allow specified high-order pages stored on PCP list Kefeng Wang
2024-04-15 8:12 ` [PATCH rfc 3/3] mm: pcp: show per-order pages count Kefeng Wang
2024-04-15 8:18 ` [PATCH rfc 0/3] mm: allow more high-order pages stored on PCP lists Barry Song
2024-04-15 8:59 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-04-15 10:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-15 11:14 ` Barry Song
2024-04-15 12:17 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-04-16 0:21 ` Barry Song
2024-04-16 4:50 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-04-16 4:58 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-04-16 5:26 ` Barry Song
2024-04-16 7:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-16 8:06 ` Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240415081220.3246839-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox