From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
vbabka@suse.cz, 21cnbao@gmail.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
david@redhat.com, ying.huang@intel.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: allowing mTHP compaction to capture the freed page directly
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:11:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412151104.GA2955562@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8118a5d66a034736a48433beddaca60ed78577c4.1712892329.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:27:04AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Currently, compaction_capture() does not allow lower-order allocations to
> directly capture the movable free pages, even though lower-order allocations
> might also be requesting movable pages, that can lead to more compaction
> scanning. And, with the enablement of mTHP, such situations will become more
> common.
>
> Thus allowing lower-order (mTHP) allocations of movable page types directly
> capture the movable free pages can avoid unnecessary compaction scanning,
> meanwhile that won't pollute the movable pageblock. With testing 1M mTHP
> compaction, it can be seen that compaction scanning is significantly reduced.
>
> mm-unstable patched
> Ops Compaction pages isolated 116598741.00 120946702.00
> Ops Compaction migrate scanned 1764870054.00 1488621550.00
> Ops Compaction free scanned 7707879039.00 4986299318.00
> Ops Compact scan efficiency 22.90 29.85
> Ops Compaction cost 73797.69 72933.48
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Letting a movable request into a partially compacted movable block
seems reasonable.
The only advantage of not doing so that I could imagine would be to
avoid mixing old with new pages, such that reclaim is more likely to
free blocks due to improved LRU grouping. But that seems
far-fetched. Notably, __compact_finished() will also stop once the
requested MOVABLE order becomes available; so not capturing at that
point likely just results in stolen work and compaction restarts.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 3:27 Baolin Wang
2024-04-12 14:06 ` Zi Yan
2024-04-12 15:11 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240412151104.GA2955562@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox