From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3] mm/memblock: remove empty dummy entry
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:37:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240408123721.k224aimkcvob3ddi@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhOEP-66xyQgA_Nz@kernel.org>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:44:31AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 01:58:21AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The dummy entry is introduced in the initial implementation of lmb in
>> commit 7c8c6b9776fb ("powerpc: Merge lmb.c and make MM initialization
>> use it.").
>>
>> As the comment says the empty dummy entry is to simplify the code.
>>
>> /* Create a dummy zero size LMB which will get coalesced away later.
>> * This simplifies the lmb_add() code below...
>> */
>>
>> While current code is reimplemented by Tejun in commit 784656f9c680
>> ("memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region()"). This empty dummy entry
>> seems not benefit the code any more.
>>
>> Let's remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
>> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
>>
>> ---
>> v2: remove cnt initialization to 0 and keep special case for empty array
>> v3: reset cnt to 0 in memblock test
>> ---
>> mm/memblock.c | 7 ++-----
>> tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 8 ++++----
>> tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>> index d09136e040d3..98d25689cf10 100644
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
>> @@ -114,12 +114,10 @@ static struct memblock_region memblock_physmem_init_regions[INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS
>>
>> struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
>> .memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions,
>> - .memory.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
>> .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS,
>> .memory.name = "memory",
>>
>> .reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions,
>> - .reserved.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
>> .reserved.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS,
>> .reserved.name = "reserved",
>>
>> @@ -130,7 +128,6 @@ struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
>> struct memblock_type physmem = {
>> .regions = memblock_physmem_init_regions,
>> - .cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
>> .max = INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS,
>> .name = "physmem",
>> };
>> @@ -356,7 +353,6 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, u
>> /* Special case for empty arrays */
>> if (type->cnt == 0) {
>> WARN_ON(type->total_size != 0);
>> - type->cnt = 1;
>
>Sorry if I wasn't clear, I meant to keep special case only in
>memblock_add_range. Here I think
>
> WARN_ON(type->cnt == 0 && type->total_size != 0);
>
>should be enough.
>
You mean change like this?
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index d09136e040d3..b75b835f99d1 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -352,16 +352,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, u
memmove(&type->regions[r], &type->regions[r + 1],
(type->cnt - (r + 1)) * sizeof(type->regions[r]));
type->cnt--;
-
- /* Special case for empty arrays */
- if (type->cnt == 0) {
- WARN_ON(type->total_size != 0);
- type->cnt = 1;
- type->regions[0].base = 0;
- type->regions[0].size = 0;
- type->regions[0].flags = 0;
- memblock_set_region_node(&type->regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
- }
+ WARN_ON(type->cnt == 0 && type->total_size != 0);
}
#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
This doesn't work, since on removing the last region, memmove would take no
effect and left regions[0].base .size .flags not changed.
So we need to keep the special handling here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 1:58 Wei Yang
2024-04-08 5:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-08 12:37 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2024-04-09 5:02 ` Mike Rapoport
[not found] ` <8d6205d4-18fb-4e98-97e6-db226dcf48f3@roeck-us.net>
2024-06-21 1:07 ` Wei Yang
2024-06-21 2:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-21 23:06 ` Wei Yang
[not found] ` <2113ef59-0efd-4de2-83f7-f5940ce40fca@roeck-us.net>
2024-06-22 18:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-23 0:31 ` Wei Yang
2024-06-21 1:11 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240408123721.k224aimkcvob3ddi@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox