linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax/bus.c: replace WARN_ON_ONCE() with lockdep asserts
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:23:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240404142326.b3d5b0f3f7b9f25f1a16288a@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402-vv-dax_abi_fixes-v1-1-c3e0fdbafba5@intel.com>

On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:24:28 -0600 Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> wrote:

> In [1], Dan points out that all of the WARN_ON_ONCE() usage in the
> referenced patch should be replaced with lockdep_assert_held(_write)().
> 
> Replace those, and additionally, replace a couple of other
> WARN_ON_ONCE() introduced in the same patch for actual failure
> cases (i.e. when acquiring a semaphore fails in a remove / unregister
> path) with dev_WARN_ONCE() as is the precedent here.
> 
> Recall that previously, unregistration paths was implicitly protected by
> overloading the device lock, which the patch in [1] sought to remove.
> This meant adding a semaphore acquisition in these unregistration paths.
> Since that can fail, and it doesn't make sense to return errors from
> these paths, retain the two instances of (now) dev_WARN_ONCE().
> 
> ...
>
> @@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ static void __unregister_dev_dax(void *dev)
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&dax_region_rwsem);
>  	kill_dev_dax(dev_dax);
>  	device_del(dev);
>  	free_dev_dax_ranges(dev_dax);

This is new and unchangelogged?

I'm taking Dan's reply to your patch as Not-A-Nack ;)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02  6:24 Vishal Verma
2024-04-04  2:33 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-04 21:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-04-04 21:32   ` Verma, Vishal L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240404142326.b3d5b0f3f7b9f25f1a16288a@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox