From: <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
To: <vbabka@suse.cz>, <rientjes@google.com>, <cl@linux.com>,
<penberg@kernel.org>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
<42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/slub: remove the check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial()
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:58:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240404055826.1469415-2-xiongwei.song@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404055826.1469415-1-xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
The check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s) with
CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL enabled here is always false.
We have already checked kmem_cache_debug() earlier and if it was true,
then we either continued or broke from the loop so we can't reach this
code in that case and don't need to check kmem_cache_debug() as part of
kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial() again. Here we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 1bb2a93cf7b6..059922044a4f 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2610,8 +2610,7 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
partial_slabs++;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
- if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
- || partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
+ if (partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
break;
#else
break;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 5:58 [PATCH v2 0/3] SLUB: improve filling cpu partial a bit in get_partial_node() xiongwei.song
2024-04-04 5:58 ` xiongwei.song [this message]
2024-04-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/slub: add slub_get_cpu_partial() helper xiongwei.song
2024-04-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: simplify get_partial_node() xiongwei.song
2024-04-04 9:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-04-07 1:47 ` Song, Xiongwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240404055826.1469415-2-xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
--to=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox