* [PATCH] mm: fix unproperly folio_put by changing API in read_pages
@ 2024-03-27 5:54 zhaoyang.huang
2024-03-27 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: zhaoyang.huang @ 2024-03-27 5:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Christoph Hellwig, linux-mm,
linux-kernel, Zhaoyang Huang, steve.kang
From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
According to the comments of readahead_page[3], the refcnt which
represents page cache dropped in [1] makes sense for two reasons, '1.
The folio is going to do IO and is locked until IO done;2. The refcnt
will be added back when found again from the page cache and then serve
for PTE or vfs' while it doesn't make sense in [2] as the refcnt of
page cache will be dropped in filemap_remove_folio.
read_pages()
{
aops->readahead
{
[1]
folio = readahead_folio();
}
...
[2]
while (folio = readahead_folio())
filemap_remove_folio(folio);
}
[3]
* Context: The page is locked and has an elevated refcount. The caller
* should decreases the refcount once the page has been submitted for I/O
* and unlock the page once all I/O to that page has completed.
* Return: A pointer to the next page, or %NULL if we are done.
Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
---
mm/readahead.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
index 130c0e7df99f..657736200a92 100644
--- a/mm/readahead.c
+++ b/mm/readahead.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void read_pages(struct readahead_control *rac)
* may be used to size the next readahead, so make sure
* they accurately reflect what happened.
*/
- while ((folio = readahead_folio(rac)) != NULL) {
+ while ((folio = __readahead_folio(rac)) != NULL) {
unsigned long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
folio_get(folio);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: fix unproperly folio_put by changing API in read_pages
2024-03-27 5:54 [PATCH] mm: fix unproperly folio_put by changing API in read_pages zhaoyang.huang
@ 2024-03-27 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2024-03-27 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhaoyang.huang
Cc: Andrew Morton, Christoph Hellwig, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
Zhaoyang Huang, steve.kang
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 01:54:06PM +0800, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
> From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
>
> According to the comments of readahead_page[3], the refcnt which
> represents page cache dropped in [1] makes sense for two reasons, '1.
> The folio is going to do IO and is locked until IO done;2. The refcnt
> will be added back when found again from the page cache and then serve
> for PTE or vfs' while it doesn't make sense in [2] as the refcnt of
> page cache will be dropped in filemap_remove_folio.
NAK, per previous email.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-27 12:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-27 5:54 [PATCH] mm: fix unproperly folio_put by changing API in read_pages zhaoyang.huang
2024-03-27 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox