linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Soma Nakata <soma.nakata01@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap: set folio->mapping to NULL before xas_store()
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:05:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240326140533.a0d0041371e21540dd934722@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240322210455.3738-1-soma.nakata01@gmail.com>

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:04:54 +0900 Soma Nakata <soma.nakata01@gmail.com> wrote:

> Functions such as __filemap_get_folio() check the truncation of
> folios based on the mapping field. Therefore setting this field to NULL
> earlier prevents unnecessary operations on already removed folios.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -139,11 +139,12 @@ static void page_cache_delete(struct address_space *mapping,
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
>  
> +	folio->mapping = NULL;
> +	/* Leave page->index set: truncation lookup relies upon it */
> +
>  	xas_store(&xas, shadow);
>  	xas_init_marks(&xas);
>  
> -	folio->mapping = NULL;
> -	/* Leave page->index set: truncation lookup relies upon it */
>  	mapping->nrpages -= nr;
>  }

Seems at least harmless, but I wonder if it can really make any
difference.  Don't readers of folio->mapping lock the folio first?


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-22 21:04 Soma Nakata
2024-03-26 21:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-03-26 22:50   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 22:52   ` Soma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240326140533.a0d0041371e21540dd934722@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=soma.nakata01@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox