From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF00CC54E58 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0BA266B0083; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 04:46:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 06B9B6B0087; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 04:46:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E741D6B0088; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 04:46:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D727F6B0083 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 04:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0CC141763 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:46:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81927672204.03.084038D Received: from chinatelecom.cn (smtpnm6-05.21cn.com [182.42.157.213]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0140E40009 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of chentt10@chinatelecom.cn designates 182.42.157.213 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=chentt10@chinatelecom.cn; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1711183580; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:references; bh=/bF7L3LdHQTGLmX6dO/mi7Q27FrbhvYtOl6ChhnWopY=; b=MHs+NLmEjbCMW6E2Jt6zQ/foIXbhFAPMflYy8qi3FOu9HaBtd5VPDcjSzPdOJF5ffWQcsU v3q8jjMU11iOVUAGRiCQsAOPyutOIhZCiyH4fnDQcJaIChxq88f1D5MUcqPKYVyxwyBt8/ uGxoOh7cnXwxshsmXqaxYsUGcG6tuc0= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1711183580; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qpRNGu6RSv/mQXSw7bDrrhNZaq+sfzCvMzkQbOWmLQwiO9poD2DIoOChJROnJAiZbGVvf4 sPiFuNQ1ydK61b6tJVbcPnZnsPm0K4jtQa0RZc8iHIfyzb1hYFW8IF7XdpTS+2B9BVvWaD 3IshLDba+6e4XOZKfFBE9CJGTO/qnHc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of chentt10@chinatelecom.cn designates 182.42.157.213 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=chentt10@chinatelecom.cn; dmarc=none HMM_SOURCE_IP:192.168.137.232:3649.1797840252 HMM_ATTACHE_NUM:0000 HMM_SOURCE_TYPE:SMTP Received: from clientip-36.111.64.84 (unknown [192.168.137.232]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 368419BD0A; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:46:08 +0800 (CST) X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: chentt10@chinatelecom.cn Received: from ([36.111.64.84]) by gateway-ssl-dep-77bc75f6c8-jgbgh with ESMTP id 093e69577b2144e3b8c2a8bd28ab5af2 for akpm@linux-foundation.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:46:12 CST X-Transaction-ID: 093e69577b2144e3b8c2a8bd28ab5af2 X-Real-From: chentt10@chinatelecom.cn X-Receive-IP: 36.111.64.84 X-MEDUSA-Status: 0 From: Chen Taotao To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC] mm: get_mm_counter() get the total memory usage of the process Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:11:39 +0800 Message-Id: <20240322151139.7417-1-chentt10@chinatelecom.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Stat-Signature: 43se58mb4y39defpyk76auf1px5xkzjj X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0140E40009 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1711183577-122905 X-HE-Meta: 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 jk7faO6S fFKCPmok1aMMAlkWGQVQjec/BSlTcAch4xIp0QzdPqe6Vjz0z8uYwB8GbbiVxqZe5BWHRN5smyzGZTBUXCb7PXHur2/1BjSFGxIxC136QNuzkmvSH3UrHZ1rgeDF+Gaj+m4KIUhchJyOrsFzgRP6ekaHsjQ== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.067285, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Currently, the get_mm_counter() function returns only the value of the process memory counter percpu_counter ->count record, ignoring the memory usage count maintained by each CPU in the percpu_counter->counters array, which leads to an error in obtaining the memory usage count of a process, especially when there are many CPU cores. counts, especially when there are many CPU cores. It is now possible to have get_mm_counter() get the memory count of a process by adding the memory counts maintained by each cpu, thus getting an accurate memory count of the process. This patch is an unofficial version that simply fixes the above problem, as I'm not sure if it makes sense to do so. Signed-off-by: Chen Taotao --- include/linux/mm.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index f5a97dec5..5cf6443aa 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2569,7 +2569,7 @@ static inline bool get_user_page_fast_only(unsigned long addr, */ static inline unsigned long get_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member) { - return percpu_counter_read_positive(&mm->rss_stat[member]); + return percpu_counter_sum_positive(&mm->rss_stat[member]); } void mm_trace_rss_stat(struct mm_struct *mm, int member); -- 2.27.0