From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/madvise: make MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE) handle VM_FAULT_RETRY properly
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:50:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240317165017.GD1927156@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314161300.382526-1-david@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 05:12:58PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Derrick reports that in some cases where pread() would fail with -EIO and
> mmap()+access would generate a SIGBUS signal, MADV_POPULATE_READ /
> MADV_POPULATE_WRITE will keep retrying forever and not fail with -EFAULT.
>
> It all boils down to missing VM_FAULT_RETRY handling. Let's try to handle
> that in a better way, similar to how ordinary GUP handles it.
>
> Details in patch #1. In short, move special MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE)
> VMA handling into __get_user_pages(), and make faultin_page_range()
> call __get_user_pages_locked(), which handles VM_FAULT_RETRY. Further,
> avoid the now-useless madvise VMA walk, because __get_user_pages() will
> perform the VMA lookup either way.
>
> I briefly played with handling the FOLL_MADV_POPULATE checks in
> __get_user_pages() a bit differently, integrating them with existing
> handling, but it ended up looking worse. So I decided to keep it simple.
>
> Likely, we need better selftests, but the reproducer from Darrick might
> be a bit hard to convert into a simple selftest.
>
> Note that using mlock() in Darricks reproducer results in a similar
> endless retry. Likely, that is not what we want, and we should handle
> VM_FAULT_RETRY in populate_vma_page_range() / __mm_populate() as well.
> However, similarly using __get_user_pages_locked() might be more
> complicated, because of the advanced VMA handling in
> populate_vma_page_range().
>
> Further, most populate_vma_page_range() callers simply ignore the return
> values, so it's unclear in which cases we expect to just silently fail, or
> where we'd want to retry+fail or endlessly retry instead.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
After a few days I haven't seen any problems, so
Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
>
> David Hildenbrand (2):
> mm/madvise: make MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE) handle VM_FAULT_RETRY
> properly
> mm/madvise: don't perform madvise VMA walk for
> MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE)
>
> mm/gup.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> mm/internal.h | 10 ++++++----
> mm/madvise.c | 43 +++++++++++++---------------------------
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: f48159f866f422371bb1aad10eb4d05b29ca4d8c
> --
> 2.43.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-17 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 16:12 David Hildenbrand
2024-03-14 16:12 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] " David Hildenbrand
2024-03-14 16:13 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/madvise: don't perform madvise VMA walk for MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE) David Hildenbrand
2024-03-15 2:25 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/madvise: make MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE) handle VM_FAULT_RETRY properly Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-17 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-03-17 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH] xfs_io: add linux madvise advice codes Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-17 16:53 ` [RFC PATCH] fstests: test MADV_POPULATE_READ with IO errors Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-17 21:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-17 21:14 ` [RFC PATCH] xfs_io: add linux madvise advice codes Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240317165017.GD1927156@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox