linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, Stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memtest: use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE in memory scanning
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:21:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240313172141.GB3064248@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312080422.691222-1-qiang4.zhang@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 04:04:23PM +0800, Qiang Zhang wrote:
> memtest failed to find bad memory when compiled with clang. So use
> {WRITE,READ}_ONCE  to access memory to avoid compiler over optimization.

This commit message is severely lacking in details in my opinion,
especially for a patch marked for stable. Did a kernel or LLVM change
cause this (i.e., has this always been an issue or is it a recent
regression)? What is the transformation that LLVM does to break the test
and why is using READ_ONCE() or WRITE_ONCE() sufficient to resolve it?

> Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  mm/memtest.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memtest.c b/mm/memtest.c
> index 32f3e9dda837..c2c609c39119 100644
> --- a/mm/memtest.c
> +++ b/mm/memtest.c
> @@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ static void __init memtest(u64 pattern, phys_addr_t start_phys, phys_addr_t size
>  	last_bad = 0;
>  
>  	for (p = start; p < end; p++)
> -		*p = pattern;
> +		WRITE_ONCE(*p, pattern);
>  
>  	for (p = start; p < end; p++, start_phys_aligned += incr) {
> -		if (*p == pattern)
> +		if (READ_ONCE(*p) == pattern)
>  			continue;
>  		if (start_phys_aligned == last_bad + incr) {
>  			last_bad += incr;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-12  8:04 Qiang Zhang
2024-03-13 17:21 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-03-15  6:24   ` Zhang, Qiang4

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240313172141.GB3064248@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=Stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=qiang4.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox