From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
hare@suse.de, david@fromorbit.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/13] readahead: align index to mapping_min_order in ondemand_ra and force_ra
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 17:44:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301164444.3799288-7-kernel@pankajraghav.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240301164444.3799288-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com>
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Align the ra->start and ra->size to mapping_min_order in
ondemand_readahead(), and align the index to mapping_min_order in
force_page_cache_ra(). This will ensure that the folios allocated for
readahead that are added to the page cache are aligned to
mapping_min_order.
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
mm/readahead.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
index 6336c1736cc9..0197cb91cf85 100644
--- a/mm/readahead.c
+++ b/mm/readahead.c
@@ -310,7 +310,9 @@ void force_page_cache_ra(struct readahead_control *ractl,
struct address_space *mapping = ractl->mapping;
struct file_ra_state *ra = ractl->ra;
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(mapping->host);
- unsigned long max_pages, index;
+ unsigned long max_pages;
+ pgoff_t index, new_index;
+ unsigned long min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
if (unlikely(!mapping->a_ops->read_folio && !mapping->a_ops->readahead))
return;
@@ -320,7 +322,14 @@ void force_page_cache_ra(struct readahead_control *ractl,
* be up to the optimal hardware IO size
*/
index = readahead_index(ractl);
+ new_index = mapping_align_start_index(mapping, index);
+ if (new_index != index) {
+ nr_to_read += index - new_index;
+ index = new_index;
+ }
+
max_pages = max_t(unsigned long, bdi->io_pages, ra->ra_pages);
+ max_pages = max_t(unsigned long, max_pages, min_nrpages);
nr_to_read = min_t(unsigned long, nr_to_read, max_pages);
while (nr_to_read) {
unsigned long this_chunk = (2 * 1024 * 1024) / PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -328,6 +337,7 @@ void force_page_cache_ra(struct readahead_control *ractl,
if (this_chunk > nr_to_read)
this_chunk = nr_to_read;
ractl->_index = index;
+ VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(index, min_nrpages));
do_page_cache_ra(ractl, this_chunk, 0);
index += this_chunk;
@@ -554,8 +564,11 @@ static void ondemand_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl,
unsigned long add_pages;
pgoff_t index = readahead_index(ractl);
pgoff_t expected, prev_index;
- unsigned int order = folio ? folio_order(folio) : 0;
+ unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(ractl->mapping);
+ unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(ractl->mapping);
+ unsigned int order = folio ? folio_order(folio) : min_order;
+ VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(index, min_nrpages));
/*
* If the request exceeds the readahead window, allow the read to
* be up to the optimal hardware IO size
@@ -577,7 +590,7 @@ static void ondemand_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl,
1UL << order);
if (index == expected || index == (ra->start + ra->size)) {
ra->start += ra->size;
- ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages);
+ ra->size = max(get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages), min_nrpages);
ra->async_size = ra->size;
goto readit;
}
@@ -602,7 +615,7 @@ static void ondemand_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl,
ra->start = start;
ra->size = start - index; /* old async_size */
ra->size += req_size;
- ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages);
+ ra->size = max(get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages), min_nrpages);
ra->async_size = ra->size;
goto readit;
}
@@ -639,7 +652,7 @@ static void ondemand_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl,
initial_readahead:
ra->start = index;
- ra->size = get_init_ra_size(req_size, max_pages);
+ ra->size = max(min_nrpages, get_init_ra_size(req_size, max_pages));
ra->async_size = ra->size > req_size ? ra->size - req_size : ra->size;
readit:
@@ -650,7 +663,7 @@ static void ondemand_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl,
* Take care of maximum IO pages as above.
*/
if (index == ra->start && ra->size == ra->async_size) {
- add_pages = get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages);
+ add_pages = max(get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages), min_nrpages);
if (ra->size + add_pages <= max_pages) {
ra->async_size = add_pages;
ra->size += add_pages;
@@ -660,7 +673,7 @@ static void ondemand_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl,
}
}
- ractl->_index = ra->start;
+ ractl->_index = mapping_align_start_index(ractl->mapping, ra->start);
page_cache_ra_order(ractl, ra, order);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-01 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 16:44 [PATCH v2 00/13] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] mm: Support order-1 folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 17:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 17:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] filemap: align the index to mapping_min_order in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 19:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-01 20:04 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-04 15:38 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-04 15:36 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] filemap: use mapping_min_order while allocating folios Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] readahead: round up file_ra_state->ra_pages to mapping_min_nrpages Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] readahead: rework loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in ra_(unbounded|order) Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-01 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240301164444.3799288-7-kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox