linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
	surenb@google.com, stefanha@redhat.com, brauner@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	yi.l.liu@intel.com, ardb@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	andreyknvl@gmail.com, wangjinchao@xfusion.com, gshan@redhat.com,
	shahuang@redhat.com, ricarkol@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, rananta@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	david@redhat.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bhe@redhat.com,
	aniketa@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com,
	apopple@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, mochs@nvidia.com, zhiw@nvidia.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] kvm: arm64: introduce new flag for non-cacheable IO memory
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 12:21:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240220122103.GB5613@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220072926.6466-2-ankita@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:59:23PM +0530, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> 
> Currently, KVM for ARM64 maps at stage 2 memory that is considered device
> (i.e. it is not RAM) with DEVICE_nGnRE memory attributes; this setting
> overrides (as per the ARM architecture [1]) any device MMIO mapping
> present at stage 1, resulting in a set-up whereby a guest operating
> system cannot determine device MMIO mapping memory attributes on its
> own but it is always overridden by the KVM stage 2 default.
> 
> This set-up does not allow guest operating systems to select device
> memory attributes independently from KVM stage-2 mappings
> (refer to [1], "Combining stage 1 and stage 2 memory type attributes"),
> which turns out to be an issue in that guest operating systems
> (e.g. Linux) may request to map devices MMIO regions with memory
> attributes that guarantee better performance (e.g. gathering
> attribute - that for some devices can generate larger PCIe memory
> writes TLPs) and specific operations (e.g. unaligned transactions)
> such as the NormalNC memory type.
> 
> The default device stage 2 mapping was chosen in KVM for ARM64 since
> it was considered safer (i.e. it would not allow guests to trigger
> uncontained failures ultimately crashing the machine) but this
> turned out to be asynchronous (SError) defeating the purpose.
> 
> Failures containability is a property of the platform and is independent
> from the memory type used for MMIO device memory mappings.
> 
> Actually, DEVICE_nGnRE memory type is even more problematic than
> Normal-NC memory type in terms of faults containability in that e.g.
> aborts triggered on DEVICE_nGnRE loads cannot be made, architecturally,
> synchronous (i.e. that would imply that the processor should issue at
> most 1 load transaction at a time - it cannot pipeline them - otherwise
> the synchronous abort semantics would break the no-speculation attribute
> attached to DEVICE_XXX memory).
> 
> This means that regardless of the combined stage1+stage2 mappings a
> platform is safe if and only if device transactions cannot trigger
> uncontained failures and that in turn relies on platform capabilities
> and the device type being assigned (i.e. PCIe AER/DPC error containment
> and RAS architecture[3]); therefore the default KVM device stage 2
> memory attributes play no role in making device assignment safer
> for a given platform (if the platform design adheres to design
> guidelines outlined in [3]) and therefore can be relaxed.
> 
> For all these reasons, relax the KVM stage 2 device memory attributes
> from DEVICE_nGnRE to Normal-NC.
> 
> The NormalNC was chosen over a different Normal memory type default
> at stage-2 (e.g. Normal Write-through) to avoid cache allocation/snooping.
> 
> Relaxing S2 KVM device MMIO mappings to Normal-NC is not expected to
> trigger any issue on guest device reclaim use cases either (i.e. device
> MMIO unmap followed by a device reset) at least for PCIe devices, in that
> in PCIe a device reset is architected and carried out through PCI config
> space transactions that are naturally ordered with respect to MMIO
> transactions according to the PCI ordering rules.
> 
> Having Normal-NC S2 default puts guests in control (thanks to
> stage1+stage2 combined memory attributes rules [1]) of device MMIO
> regions memory mappings, according to the rules described in [1]
> and summarized here ([(S1) - stage1], [(S2) - stage 2]):
> 
> S1           |  S2           | Result
> NORMAL-WB    |  NORMAL-NC    | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-WT    |  NORMAL-NC    | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-NC    |  NORMAL-NC    | NORMAL-NC
> DEVICE<attr> |  NORMAL-NC    | DEVICE<attr>
> 
> It is worth noting that currently, to map devices MMIO space to user
> space in a device pass-through use case the VFIO framework applies memory
> attributes derived from pgprot_noncached() settings applied to VMAs, which
> result in device-nGnRnE memory attributes for the stage-1 VMM mappings.
> 
> This means that a userspace mapping for device MMIO space carried
> out with the current VFIO framework and a guest OS mapping for the same
> MMIO space may result in a mismatched alias as described in [2].
> 
> Defaulting KVM device stage-2 mappings to Normal-NC attributes does not
> change anything in this respect, in that the mismatched aliases would
> only affect (refer to [2] for a detailed explanation) ordering between
> the userspace and GuestOS mappings resulting stream of transactions
> (i.e. it does not cause loss of property for either stream of
> transactions on its own), which is harmless given that the userspace
> and GuestOS access to the device is carried out through independent
> transactions streams.
> 
> A Normal-NC flag is not present today. So add a new kvm_pgtable_prot
> (KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC) flag for it, along with its
> corresponding PTE value 0x5 (0b101) determined from [1].
> 
> Lastly, adapt the stage2 PTE property setter function
> (stage2_set_prot_attr) to handle the NormalNC attribute.
> 
> [1] section D8.5.5 - DDI0487J_a_a-profile_architecture_reference_manual.pdf
> [2] section B2.8 - DDI0487J_a_a-profile_architecture_reference_manual.pdf
> [3] sections 1.7.7.3/1.8.5.2/appendix C - DEN0029H_SBSA_7.1.pdf
> 
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h      |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-20 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-20  7:29 [PATCH v8 0/4] kvm: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for " ankita
2024-02-20  7:29 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] kvm: arm64: introduce new flag for non-cacheable " ankita
2024-02-20 12:21   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2024-02-20 14:27   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2024-02-21  6:01     ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20  7:29 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] mm: introduce new flag to indicate wc safe ankita
2024-02-20  8:26   ` Zhi Wang
2024-02-20  8:51     ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20  9:07       ` Zhi Wang
2024-02-20  9:08         ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20  9:09       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-20  9:33         ` Zhi Wang
2024-02-20  9:40           ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20  7:29 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] kvm: arm64: set io memory s2 pte as normalnc for vfio pci device ankita
2024-02-23 17:07   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20  7:29 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] vfio: convey kvm that the vfio-pci device is wc safe ankita
2024-02-20  9:56   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-20 12:11     ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-22 20:52   ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-23 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] kvm: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240220122103.GB5613@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=danw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=wangjinchao@xfusion.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox