linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] mm/gup: Use ptep_get_lockless_norecency()
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:17:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240215121756.2734131-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240215121756.2734131-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>

Gup needs to read ptes locklessly, so it uses ptep_get_lockless().
However, the returned access and dirty bits are unimportant so let's
switch over to ptep_get_lockless_norecency().

The wrinkle is that gup needs to check that the pte hasn't changed once
it has pinned the folio following this model:

    pte = ptep_get_lockless_norecency(ptep)
    ...
    if (!pte_same(pte, ptep_get_lockless(ptep)))
            // RACE!
    ...

And now that pte may not contain correct access and dirty information,
the pte_same() comparison could spuriously fail. So let's introduce a
new pte_same_norecency() helper which will ignore the access and dirty
bits when doing the comparison.

Note that previously, ptep_get() was being used for the comparison; this
is technically incorrect because the PTL is not held. I've also
converted the comparison to use the preferred pmd_same() helper instead
of doing a raw value comparison.

As a side-effect, this new approach removes the possibility of
concurrent read/write to the page causing a spurious fast gup failure,
because the access and dirty bits are no longer used in the comparison.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/pgtable.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 mm/gup.c                |  7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
index 9dd40fdbd825..8123affa8baf 100644
--- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -936,6 +936,24 @@ static inline int pte_same(pte_t pte_a, pte_t pte_b)
 }
 #endif

+/**
+ * pte_same_norecency - Compare pte_a and pte_b, ignoring young and dirty bits,
+ *			if the ptes are present.
+ *
+ * @pte_a: First pte to compare.
+ * @pte_b: Second pte to compare.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if the ptes match, else 0.
+ */
+static inline int pte_same_norecency(pte_t pte_a, pte_t pte_b)
+{
+	if (pte_present(pte_a))
+		pte_a = pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(pte_a));
+	if (pte_present(pte_b))
+		pte_b = pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(pte_b));
+	return pte_same(pte_a, pte_b);
+}
+
 #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_UNUSED
 /*
  * Some architectures provide facilities to virtualization guests
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index df83182ec72d..0f96d0a5ec09 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2576,7 +2576,7 @@ static int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pmd, pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
 	if (!ptep)
 		return 0;
 	do {
-		pte_t pte = ptep_get_lockless(ptep);
+		pte_t pte = ptep_get_lockless_norecency(ptep);
 		struct page *page;
 		struct folio *folio;

@@ -2617,8 +2617,9 @@ static int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pmd, pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
 			goto pte_unmap;
 		}

-		if (unlikely(pmd_val(pmd) != pmd_val(*pmdp)) ||
-		    unlikely(pte_val(pte) != pte_val(ptep_get(ptep)))) {
+		if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmd, *pmdp)) ||
+		    unlikely(!pte_same_norecency(pte,
+					ptep_get_lockless_norecency(ptep)))) {
 			gup_put_folio(folio, 1, flags);
 			goto pte_unmap;
 		}
--
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15 12:17 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Reduce cost of ptep_get_lockless on arm64 Ryan Roberts
2024-02-15 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] mm: Introduce ptep_get_lockless_norecency() Ryan Roberts
     [not found]   ` <7aefa967-43aa-490b-ae0d-7d1455402e89@redhat.com>
2024-03-26 16:39     ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27  9:28       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27  9:57         ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 17:02           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-15 12:17 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-03-26 16:30   ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] mm/gup: Use ptep_get_lockless_norecency() David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 16:48     ` Ryan Roberts
2024-02-15 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] mm/memory: Use ptep_get_lockless_norecency() for orig_pte Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 17:02   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 17:27     ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 17:38       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 17:48         ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 17:58           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27  9:51             ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 17:05               ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-15 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] arm64/mm: Override ptep_get_lockless_norecency() Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 16:35   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Reduce cost of ptep_get_lockless on arm64 David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 16:31   ` Ryan Roberts
     [not found]     ` <de143212-49ce-4c30-8bfa-4c0ff613f107@redhat.com>
2024-03-26 16:53       ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 17:04         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 17:32           ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 17:39             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 17:51               ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27  9:34                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 10:01                   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-03 12:59                   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-08  8:36                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 16:35                       ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-10 20:09                         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-11  9:45                           ` Ryan Roberts
     [not found]                             ` <70a36403-aefd-4311-b612-84e602465689@redhat.com>
2024-04-15  9:28                               ` Ryan Roberts
     [not found]                                 ` <3e50030d-2289-4470-a727-a293baa21618@redhat.com>
2024-04-15 13:30                                   ` Ryan Roberts
     [not found]                                     ` <969dc6c3-2764-4a35-9fa6-7596832fb2a3@redhat.com>
2024-04-15 14:34                                       ` Ryan Roberts
     [not found]                                         ` <11b1c25b-3e20-4acf-9be5-57b508266c5b@redhat.com>
2024-04-15 15:17                                           ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-15 15:22                                             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-15 15:53                                               ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-15 16:02                                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-23 10:15                                                   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-23 10:18                                                     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240215121756.2734131-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox