From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kbusch@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: [RFC v2 02/14] filemap: align the index to mapping_min_order in the page cache
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:37:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213093713.1753368-3-kernel@pankajraghav.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213093713.1753368-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com>
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Supporting mapping_min_order implies that we guarantee each folio in the
page cache has at least an order of mapping_min_order. So when adding new
folios to the page cache we must ensure the index used is aligned to the
mapping_min_order as the page cache requires the index to be aligned to
the order of the folio.
A higher order folio than min_order by definition is a multiple of the
min_order. If an index is aligned to an order higher than a min_order, it
will also be aligned to the min order.
This effectively introduces no new functional changes when min order is
not set other than a few rounding computations that should result in the
same value.
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
mm/filemap.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 750e779c23db..323a8e169581 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2479,14 +2479,16 @@ static int filemap_get_pages(struct kiocb *iocb, size_t count,
{
struct file *filp = iocb->ki_filp;
struct address_space *mapping = filp->f_mapping;
+ unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
struct file_ra_state *ra = &filp->f_ra;
- pgoff_t index = iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ pgoff_t index = round_down(iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT, min_nrpages);
pgoff_t last_index;
struct folio *folio;
int err = 0;
/* "last_index" is the index of the page beyond the end of the read */
last_index = DIV_ROUND_UP(iocb->ki_pos + count, PAGE_SIZE);
+ last_index = round_up(last_index, min_nrpages);
retry:
if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
return -EINTR;
@@ -2502,8 +2504,7 @@ static int filemap_get_pages(struct kiocb *iocb, size_t count,
if (!folio_batch_count(fbatch)) {
if (iocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_NOWAIT | IOCB_WAITQ))
return -EAGAIN;
- err = filemap_create_folio(filp, mapping,
- iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT, fbatch);
+ err = filemap_create_folio(filp, mapping, index, fbatch);
if (err == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE)
goto retry;
return err;
@@ -3095,7 +3096,10 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
struct file *file = vmf->vma->vm_file;
struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra;
struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
- DEFINE_READAHEAD(ractl, file, ra, mapping, vmf->pgoff);
+ unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
+ unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(file->f_mapping);
+ pgoff_t index = round_down(vmf->pgoff, min_nrpages);
+ DEFINE_READAHEAD(ractl, file, ra, mapping, index);
struct file *fpin = NULL;
unsigned long vm_flags = vmf->vma->vm_flags;
unsigned int mmap_miss;
@@ -3147,10 +3151,11 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
*/
fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin);
ra->start = max_t(long, 0, vmf->pgoff - ra->ra_pages / 2);
+ ra->start = round_down(ra->start, min_nrpages);
ra->size = ra->ra_pages;
ra->async_size = ra->ra_pages / 4;
ractl._index = ra->start;
- page_cache_ra_order(&ractl, ra, 0);
+ page_cache_ra_order(&ractl, ra, min_order);
return fpin;
}
@@ -3164,7 +3169,9 @@ static struct file *do_async_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf,
{
struct file *file = vmf->vma->vm_file;
struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra;
- DEFINE_READAHEAD(ractl, file, ra, file->f_mapping, vmf->pgoff);
+ unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(file->f_mapping);
+ pgoff_t index = round_down(vmf->pgoff, min_nrpages);
+ DEFINE_READAHEAD(ractl, file, ra, file->f_mapping, index);
struct file *fpin = NULL;
unsigned int mmap_miss;
@@ -3212,13 +3219,17 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
struct file *file = vmf->vma->vm_file;
struct file *fpin = NULL;
struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
+ unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
+ unsigned int nrpages = 1UL << min_order;
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
- pgoff_t max_idx, index = vmf->pgoff;
+ pgoff_t max_idx, index = round_down(vmf->pgoff, nrpages);
struct folio *folio;
vm_fault_t ret = 0;
bool mapping_locked = false;
max_idx = DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(inode), PAGE_SIZE);
+ max_idx = round_up(max_idx, nrpages);
+
if (unlikely(index >= max_idx))
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
@@ -3317,13 +3328,17 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
* We must recheck i_size under page lock.
*/
max_idx = DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(inode), PAGE_SIZE);
+ max_idx = round_up(max_idx, nrpages);
+
if (unlikely(index >= max_idx)) {
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
}
- vmf->page = folio_file_page(folio, index);
+ VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(folio) < min_order, folio);
+
+ vmf->page = folio_file_page(folio, vmf->pgoff);
return ret | VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
page_not_uptodate:
@@ -3658,6 +3673,9 @@ static struct folio *do_read_cache_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
{
struct folio *folio;
int err;
+ unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
+
+ index = round_down(index, min_nrpages);
if (!filler)
filler = mapping->a_ops->read_folio;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 9:36 [RFC v2 00/14] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 01/14] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 12:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:05 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 21:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 19:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-15 10:34 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-14 18:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-15 10:21 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2024-02-13 12:20 ` [RFC v2 02/14] filemap: align the index to mapping_min_order in the page cache Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 21:13 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 03/14] filemap: use mapping_min_order while allocating folios Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 14:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 22:05 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 10:13 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 04/14] readahead: set file_ra_state->ra_pages to be at least mapping_min_order Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 14:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 22:09 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 13:32 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-14 13:53 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 05/14] readahead: align index to mapping_min_order in ondemand_ra and force_ra Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 22:29 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 15:10 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 06/14] readahead: rework loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 07/14] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in ra_(unbounded|order) Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 08/14] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 09/14] mm: Support order-1 folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 10/14] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:27 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 21:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 15:13 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 11/14] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:32 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 12/14] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:48 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 22:44 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 15:51 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 13/14] xfs: add an experimental CONFIG_XFS_LBS option Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:19 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-13 21:54 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-13 9:37 ` [RFC v2 14/14] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 16:40 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 21:34 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 16:35 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-15 22:17 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240213093713.1753368-3-kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox