From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] virtio: Treat alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure as non-fatal
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:18:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213061823.GB27995@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65caa3966caa_5a7f294cf@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 03:02:46PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> However, Lukas, I think Linus is right, your DEFINE_FREE() should use
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Uh... that's a negative, sir. ;)
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() results in...
* a superfluous NULL pointer check in x509_key_preparse() and
* a superfluous IS_ERR check in x509_cert_parse().
IS_ERR() results *only* in...
* a superfluous IS_ERR check in x509_cert_parse().
I can get rid of the IS_ERR() check by using assume().
I can *not* get rid of the NULL pointer check because the compiler
is compiled with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks. (The compiler
seems to ignore __attribute__((returns_nonnull)) due to that.)
> I.e. the problem is trying to use
> __free(x509_free_certificate) in x509_cert_parse().
>
> > --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > @@ -60,24 +60,24 @@ void x509_free_certificate(struct x509_certificate *cert)
> > */
> > struct x509_certificate *x509_cert_parse(const void *data, size_t datalen)
> > {
> > - struct x509_certificate *cert;
> > - struct x509_parse_context *ctx;
> > + struct x509_certificate *cert __free(x509_free_certificate);
>
> ...make this:
>
> struct x509_certificate *cert __free(kfree);
That doesn't work I'm afraid. x509_cert_parse() needs
x509_free_certificate() to be called in the error path,
not kfree(). See the existing code in current mainline:
x509_cert_parse() populates three sub-allocations in
struct x509_certificate (pub, sig, id) and two
sub-sub-allocations (pub->key, pub->params).
So I'd have to add five additional local variables which
get freed by __cleanup(). One of them (pub->key) requires
kfree_sensitive() instead of kfree(), so I'd need an extra
DEFINE_FREE() for that.
I haven't tried it but I suspect the result would look
terrible and David Howells wouldn't like it.
> ...and Mathieu, this should be IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to skip an unnecessary
> call to virtio_fs_cleanup_dax() at function exit that the compiler
> should elide.
My recommendation is to check for !IS_ERR() in the DEFINE_FREE() clause
and amend virtio_fs_cleanup_dax() with a "if (!dax_dev) return;" for
defensiveness in case someone calls it with a NULL pointer.
That's the best solution I could come up with for the x509_certificate
conversion.
Note that even with superfluous checks avoided, __cleanup() causes
gcc-12 to always generate two return paths. It's very visible in
the generated code that all the stack unwinding code gets duplicated
in every function using __cleanup(). The existing Assembler code
of x509_key_preparse() and x509_cert_parse(), without __cleanup()
invocation, has only a single return path.
So __cleanup() bloats the code regardless of superfluous checks,
but future gcc versions might avoid that. clang-15 generates much
more compact code (vmlinux is a couple hundred kBytes smaller),
but does weird things such as inlining x509_free_certificate()
in x509_cert_parse().
As you may have guessed, I've spent an inordinate amount of time
down that rabbit hole. ;(
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-12 16:30 [PATCH v5 0/8] Introduce cpu_dcache_is_aliasing() to fix DAX regression Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] dax: alloc_dax() return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP) for CONFIG_DAX=n Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-13 6:32 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-02-13 19:07 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-13 20:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] nvdimm/pmem: Treat alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure as non-fatal Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] dm: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] dcssblk: Handle alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-13 11:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-02-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] virtio: Treat alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure as non-fatal Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-12 22:04 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-12 22:08 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <65caa3966caa_5a7f294cf@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
2024-02-13 6:18 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2024-02-13 18:56 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-13 20:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-13 6:25 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-02-13 19:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-14 6:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] dax: Check for data cache aliasing at runtime Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-12 16:31 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] Introduce cpu_dcache_is_aliasing() across all architectures Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-02-12 16:31 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] dax: Fix incorrect list of data cache aliasing architectures Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240213061823.GB27995@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox