* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore [not found] <20240212-selftest_gitignore-v2-4-75f0de50a178@gmail.com> @ 2024-02-12 19:53 ` SeongJae Park 2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-02-12 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Javier Carrasco Cc: Shuah Khan, SeongJae Park, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, damon, linux-mm Hello, On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote: > This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file. > > Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> 'checkpatch.pl' complains as below: WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report #11: Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> I guess the 'Closes:' could this link? https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable. Other than those, Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Thanks, SJ > --- > tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore > index c6c2965a6607..79b32e30fce3 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > huge_count_read_write > +access_memory > > -- > 2.40.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore 2024-02-12 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore SeongJae Park @ 2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco 2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Javier Carrasco @ 2024-02-12 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: SeongJae Park Cc: Shuah Khan, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, damon, linux-mm On 12.02.24 20:53, SeongJae Park wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file. >> >> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> > > 'checkpatch.pl' complains as below: > > WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report > #11: > Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> > > I guess the 'Closes:' could this link? > https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM > I will add the Closes tag with the right link, thank you. > Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable. Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced? > > Other than those, > > Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> > > > Thanks, > SJ > > >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore >> index c6c2965a6607..79b32e30fce3 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore >> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only >> huge_count_read_write >> +access_memory >> >> -- >> 2.40.1 Best regards, Javier Carrasco ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore 2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco @ 2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park 2024-02-12 22:14 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-02-12 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Javier Carrasco Cc: SeongJae Park, Shuah Khan, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, damon, linux-mm, Andrew Morton On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:07:34 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 12.02.24 20:53, SeongJae Park wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file. > >> > >> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> > >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> > > > > 'checkpatch.pl' complains as below: > > > > WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report > > #11: > > Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> > > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> > > > > I guess the 'Closes:' could this link? > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM > > > > I will add the Closes tag with the right link, thank you. Thank you :) > > > Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable. > > Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced? DAMON selftest patches could be merged in mm-unstable or linux-kselftest depending on cases. If you rebase this on mm-unstable, it might conflict on linux-kselftest. Letting Shuah merge this on linux-kselftest and asking Linus Torvalds to fix the conflict in next merge window could be one possible option. Or, making this split out of this series, rebase on mm-unstable, and asking Andrew Morton to carry may be another option. Andrew and Shuah, may I ask your opinions? Thanks, SJ [...] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore 2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park @ 2024-02-12 22:14 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2024-02-12 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: SeongJae Park Cc: Javier Carrasco, Shuah Khan, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, damon, linux-mm On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:23:56 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable. > > > > Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced? > > DAMON selftest patches could be merged in mm-unstable or linux-kselftest > depending on cases. > > If you rebase this on mm-unstable, it might conflict on linux-kselftest. > Letting Shuah merge this on linux-kselftest and asking Linus Torvalds to fix > the conflict in next merge window could be one possible option. > > Or, making this split out of this series, rebase on mm-unstable, and asking > Andrew Morton to carry may be another option. > > Andrew and Shuah, may I ask your opinions? I'd say base it on mm-unstable so we don't have conflicts for people to deal with? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-12 22:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20240212-selftest_gitignore-v2-4-75f0de50a178@gmail.com>
2024-02-12 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore SeongJae Park
2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park
2024-02-12 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox