From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
To: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
kernel-team@android.com, aarcange@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, bgeffon@google.com,
willy@infradead.org, jannh@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com,
ngeoffray@google.com, timmurray@google.com, rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] userfaultfd: use per-vma locks in userfaultfd operations
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:19:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240212151959.vnpqzvpvztabxpiv@revolver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EESO4mbS_zB6AutaGZz1Jdx1uLFy5JqhyjnDHND4tY=3bn7Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> [240209 15:59]:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:31 AM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> wrote:
...
> > > > > > > +static struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > > > > > + unsigned long address,
> > > > > > > + bool prepare_anon)
> > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, address);
> > > > > > > + if (vma) {
> > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > + * lock_vma_under_rcu() only checks anon_vma for private
> > > > > > > + * anonymous mappings. But we need to ensure it is assigned in
> > > > > > > + * private file-backed vmas as well.
> > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > + if (prepare_anon && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) &&
> > > > > > > + !vma->anon_vma)
> > > > > > > + vma_end_read(vma);
> > > > > > > + else
> > > > > > > + return vma;
> > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > > > > > > + vma = vma_lookup(mm, address);
> > > > > > > + if (vma) {
> > > > > > > + if (prepare_anon && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) &&
> > > > > > > + anon_vma_prepare(vma)) {
> > > > > > > + vma = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > + * We cannot use vma_start_read() as it may fail due to
> > > > > > > + * false locked (see comment in vma_start_read()). We
> > > > > > > + * can avoid that by directly locking vm_lock under
> > > > > > > + * mmap_lock, which guarantees that nobody can lock the
> > > > > > > + * vma for write (vma_start_write()) under us.
> > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > + down_read(&vma->vm_lock->lock);
> > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > > > > > > + return vma;
> > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +static void unlock_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > + vma_end_read(vma);
> > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > +
...
>
> The current implementation has a deadlock problem:
>
> thread 1
> thread 2
>
> vma_start_read(dst_vma)
>
>
> mmap_write_lock()
>
> vma_start_write(src_vma)
> vma_start_read(src_vma) fails
> mmap_read_lock() blocks
>
>
> vma_start_write(dst_vma)
> blocks
>
>
> I think the solution is to implement it this way:
>
> long find_and_lock_vmas(...)
> {
> dst_vma = lock_vma(mm, dst_start, true);
> if (IS_ERR(dst_vma))
> return PTR_ERR(vma);
>
> src_vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, src_start);
> if (!src_vma) {
> long err;
> if (mmap_read_trylock(mm)) {
> src_vma = vma_lookup(mm, src_start);
> if (src_vma) {
>
> down_read(&src_vma->vm_lock->lock);
> err = 0;
> } else {
> err = -ENOENT;
> }
> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> } else {
> vma_end_read(dst_vma);
> err = lock_mm_and_find_vmas(...);
> if (!err) {
Right now lock_mm_and_find_vmas() doesn't use the per-vma locking, so
you'd have to lock those here too. I'm sure you realise that, but this
is very convoluted.
> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> }
> }
> return err;
On contention you will now abort vs block.
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> Of course this would need defining lock_mm_and_find_vmas() regardless
> of CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK. I can also remove the prepare_anon condition
> in lock_vma().
You are adding a lot of complexity for a relatively rare case, which is
probably not worth optimising.
I think you'd be better served by something like :
if (likely(src_vma))
return 0;
/* Undo any locking */
vma_end_read(dst_vma);
/* Fall back to locking both in mmap_lock critical section */
mmap_read_lock();
/*
* probably worth creating an inline function for a single vma
* find/populate that can be used in lock_vma() that does the anon vma
* population?
*/
dst_vm = lock_vma_populate_anon();
...
src_vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, src_start);
...
mmap_read_unlock();
return 0;
src_failed:
vma_end_read(dst_vma);
dst_failed:
mmap_read_unlock();
return err;
Thanks,
Liam
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 21:22 [PATCH v4 0/3] per-vma locks in userfaultfd Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-08 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] userfaultfd: move userfaultfd_ctx struct to header file Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-08 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] userfaultfd: protect mmap_changing with rw_sem in userfaulfd_ctx Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-08 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] userfaultfd: use per-vma locks in userfaultfd operations Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-09 3:06 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-09 18:01 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-09 19:06 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-09 19:21 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-09 19:31 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-09 20:58 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-12 15:19 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2024-02-12 18:08 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-12 20:11 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-12 22:30 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-12 22:53 ` Liam R. Howlett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240212151959.vnpqzvpvztabxpiv@revolver \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
--cc=ngeoffray@google.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=timmurray@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox