* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore
[not found] <20240212-selftest_gitignore-v2-4-75f0de50a178@gmail.com>
@ 2024-02-12 19:53 ` SeongJae Park
2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-02-12 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Javier Carrasco
Cc: Shuah Khan, SeongJae Park, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest,
linux-kernel, damon, linux-mm
Hello,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
> This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file.
>
> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
'checkpatch.pl' complains as below:
WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
#11:
Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
I guess the 'Closes:' could this link?
https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable.
Other than those,
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Thanks,
SJ
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore
> index c6c2965a6607..79b32e30fce3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> huge_count_read_write
> +access_memory
>
> --
> 2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore
2024-02-12 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore SeongJae Park
@ 2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Javier Carrasco @ 2024-02-12 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SeongJae Park
Cc: Shuah Khan, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, damon,
linux-mm
On 12.02.24 20:53, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file.
>>
>> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
>
> 'checkpatch.pl' complains as below:
>
> WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
> #11:
> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
>
> I guess the 'Closes:' could this link?
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
>
I will add the Closes tag with the right link, thank you.
> Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable.
Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced?
>
> Other than those,
>
> Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore
>> index c6c2965a6607..79b32e30fce3 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/.gitignore
>> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> huge_count_read_write
>> +access_memory
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
Best regards,
Javier Carrasco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore
2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco
@ 2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park
2024-02-12 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-02-12 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Javier Carrasco
Cc: SeongJae Park, Shuah Khan, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest,
linux-kernel, damon, linux-mm, Andrew Morton
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:07:34 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12.02.24 20:53, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
> >
> > 'checkpatch.pl' complains as below:
> >
> > WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
> > #11:
> > Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
> >
> > I guess the 'Closes:' could this link?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
> >
>
> I will add the Closes tag with the right link, thank you.
Thank you :)
>
> > Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable.
>
> Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced?
DAMON selftest patches could be merged in mm-unstable or linux-kselftest
depending on cases.
If you rebase this on mm-unstable, it might conflict on linux-kselftest.
Letting Shuah merge this on linux-kselftest and asking Linus Torvalds to fix
the conflict in next merge window could be one possible option.
Or, making this split out of this series, rebase on mm-unstable, and asking
Andrew Morton to carry may be another option.
Andrew and Shuah, may I ask your opinions?
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore
2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-02-12 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2024-02-12 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SeongJae Park
Cc: Javier Carrasco, Shuah Khan, Bernd Edlinger, linux-kselftest,
linux-kernel, damon, linux-mm
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:23:56 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable.
> >
> > Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced?
>
> DAMON selftest patches could be merged in mm-unstable or linux-kselftest
> depending on cases.
>
> If you rebase this on mm-unstable, it might conflict on linux-kselftest.
> Letting Shuah merge this on linux-kselftest and asking Linus Torvalds to fix
> the conflict in next merge window could be one possible option.
>
> Or, making this split out of this series, rebase on mm-unstable, and asking
> Andrew Morton to carry may be another option.
>
> Andrew and Shuah, may I ask your opinions?
I'd say base it on mm-unstable so we don't have conflicts for people to
deal with?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-12 22:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20240212-selftest_gitignore-v2-4-75f0de50a178@gmail.com>
2024-02-12 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore SeongJae Park
2024-02-12 20:07 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-02-12 20:23 ` SeongJae Park
2024-02-12 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox