From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/task_mmu: Add display flag for VM_MAYOVERLAY
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:40:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208124035.1c96c256d6e8c65f70b18675@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb157154-5661-4925-b2c5-7952188b28f5@redhat.com>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:48:26 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08.02.24 09:48, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > VM_UFFD_MISSING flag is mutually exclussive with VM_MAYOVERLAY flag as they
> > both use the same bit position i.e 0x00000200 in the vm_flags. Let's update
> > show_smap_vma_flags() to display the correct flags depending on CONFIG_MMU.
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> > ---
> > This applies on v6.8-rc3
> >
> > fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > index 3f78ebbb795f..1c4eb25cfc17 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > @@ -681,7 +681,11 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > [ilog2(VM_HUGEPAGE)] = "hg",
> > [ilog2(VM_NOHUGEPAGE)] = "nh",
> > [ilog2(VM_MERGEABLE)] = "mg",
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > [ilog2(VM_UFFD_MISSING)]= "um",
> > +#else
> > + [ilog2(VM_MAYOVERLAY)] = "ov",
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> > [ilog2(VM_UFFD_WP)] = "uw",
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
> > [ilog2(VM_MTE)] = "mt",
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
I'm thinking
Fixes: b6b7a8faf05c ("mm/nommu: don't use VM_MAYSHARE for MAP_PRIVATE mappings")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 8:48 Anshuman Khandual
2024-02-08 16:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-08 20:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-02-09 22:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-12 2:00 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-02-12 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240208124035.1c96c256d6e8c65f70b18675@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox