linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>
To: tjmercier@google.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Efly Young <yangyifei03@kuaishou.com>
Cc: android-mm@google.com, yuzhao@google.com, mkoutny@suse.com,
	 cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: memcg: Use larger batches for proactive reclaim
Date: Fri,  2 Feb 2024 22:10:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240202221026.1055122-1-tjmercier@google.com> (raw)

Before 388536ac291 ("mm:vmscan: fix inaccurate reclaim during proactive
reclaim") we passed the number of pages for the reclaim request directly
to try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages, which could lead to significant
overreclaim. After 0388536ac291 the number of pages was limited to a
maximum 32 (SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) to reduce the amount of overreclaim.
However such a small batch size caused a regression in reclaim
performance due to many more reclaim start/stop cycles inside
memory_reclaim.

Reclaim tries to balance nr_to_reclaim fidelity with fairness across
nodes and cgroups over which the pages are spread. As such, the bigger
the request, the bigger the absolute overreclaim error. Historic
in-kernel users of reclaim have used fixed, small sized requests to
approach an appropriate reclaim rate over time. When we reclaim a user
request of arbitrary size, use decaying batch sizes to manage error while
maintaining reasonable throughput.

root - full reclaim       pages/sec   time (sec)
pre-0388536ac291      :    68047        10.46
post-0388536ac291     :    13742        inf
(reclaim-reclaimed)/4 :    67352        10.51

/uid_0 - 1G reclaim       pages/sec   time (sec)  overreclaim (MiB)
pre-0388536ac291      :    258822       1.12            107.8
post-0388536ac291     :    105174       2.49            3.5
(reclaim-reclaimed)/4 :    233396       1.12            -7.4

/uid_0 - full reclaim     pages/sec   time (sec)
pre-0388536ac291      :    72334        7.09
post-0388536ac291     :    38105        14.45
(reclaim-reclaimed)/4 :    72914        6.96

Fixes: 0388536ac291 ("mm:vmscan: fix inaccurate reclaim during proactive reclaim")
Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>

---
v2: Simplify the request size calculation per Johannes Weiner and Michal Koutný

 mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 46d8d02114cf..e6f921555e07 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6965,6 +6965,9 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
 	while (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim) {
 		unsigned long reclaimed;
 
+		/* Will converge on zero, but reclaim enforces a minimum */
+		unsigned long batch_size = (nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed) / 4;
+
 		if (signal_pending(current))
 			return -EINTR;
 
@@ -6977,7 +6980,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
 			lru_add_drain_all();
 
 		reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg,
-					min(nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
+					batch_size,
 					GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options);
 
 		if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--)
-- 
2.43.0.594.gd9cf4e227d-goog



             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-02 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-02 22:10 T.J. Mercier [this message]
2024-02-02 22:13 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-02-02 22:29   ` T.J. Mercier
2024-02-02 22:35     ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-02-02 22:41   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-02-02 22:51     ` T.J. Mercier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240202221026.1055122-1-tjmercier@google.com \
    --to=tjmercier@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=android-mm@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=yangyifei03@kuaishou.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox