From: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
corbet@lwn.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gregory.price@memverge.com, honggyu.kim@sk.com, rakie.kim@sk.com,
hyeongtak.ji@sk.com, mhocko@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
vtavarespetr@micron.com, jgroves@micron.com,
ravis.opensrc@micron.com, sthanneeru@micron.com,
emirakhur@micron.com, Hasan.Maruf@amd.com,
seungjun.ha@samsung.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] mm/mempolicy: protect task interleave functions with tsk->mems_allowed_seq
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:02:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240202170238.90004-5-gregory.price@memverge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202170238.90004-1-gregory.price@memverge.com>
In the event of rebind, pol->nodemask can change at the same time as an
allocation occurs. We can detect this with tsk->mems_allowed_seq and
prevent a miscount or an allocation failure from occurring.
The same thing happens in the allocators to detect failure, but this
can prevent spurious failures in a much smaller critical section.
Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d8cc3a577986..ed0d5d2d456a 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1878,11 +1878,17 @@ bool apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
{
- unsigned int node = current->il_prev;
-
- if (!current->il_weight || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
+ unsigned int node;
+ unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
+
+retry:
+ /* to prevent miscount use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
+ cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+ node = current->il_prev;
+ if (!node || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
node = next_node_in(node, policy->nodes);
- /* can only happen if nodemask is being rebound */
+ if (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie))
+ goto retry;
if (node == MAX_NUMNODES)
return node;
current->il_prev = node;
@@ -1896,8 +1902,14 @@ static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
static unsigned int interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
{
unsigned int nid;
+ unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
+
+ /* to prevent miscount, use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
+ do {
+ cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+ nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
+ } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));
- nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
if (nid < MAX_NUMNODES)
current->il_prev = nid;
return nid;
@@ -2374,6 +2386,7 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
struct page **page_array)
{
struct task_struct *me = current;
+ unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
unsigned long total_allocated = 0;
unsigned long nr_allocated = 0;
unsigned long rounds;
@@ -2391,7 +2404,13 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
if (!nr_pages)
return 0;
- nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
+ /* read the nodes onto the stack, retry if done during rebind */
+ do {
+ cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+ nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
+ } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));
+
+ /* if the nodemask has become invalid, we cannot do anything */
if (!nnodes)
return 0;
--
2.39.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 17:02 [PATCH v5 0/4] mm/mempolicy: weighted interleave mempolicy and sysfs extension Gregory Price
2024-02-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mm/mempolicy: implement the sysfs-based weighted_interleave interface Gregory Price
2024-02-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/mempolicy: refactor a read-once mechanism into a function for re-use Gregory Price
2024-02-02 17:02 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2024-02-05 5:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] mm/mempolicy: protect task interleave functions with tsk->mems_allowed_seq Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240202170238.90004-5-gregory.price@memverge.com \
--to=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
--cc=Hasan.Maruf@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=emirakhur@micron.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=hyeongtak.ji@sk.com \
--cc=jgroves@micron.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ravis.opensrc@micron.com \
--cc=seungjun.ha@samsung.com \
--cc=sthanneeru@micron.com \
--cc=vtavarespetr@micron.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox