linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] block: set noio context in submit_bio_noacct_nocheck
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:52:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240126135224.GA3368@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c4a4cf3-c5ed-4236-a6b2-9d53e927f979@kernel.dk>

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 09:13:37AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Nono, you don't understand.  The plan is to remove GFP_NOIO
> > entirely.  Allocations should be done with GFP_KERNEL while under a
> > memalloc_noio_save().
> 
> I do understand, but thanks for the vote of confidence. Place the
> save/restore higher up, most likely actual IO submission isn't going to
> be the only (or even major) allocation potentially needed for the IO.

NOIO is defined as allocations that will not recurse into the I/O stack.
So for anything block based, entering the block layer is literally
the defined boundary where it should be used below.  So no, wrapping
every submit_bio into a context annotation doesn't make much sense.



      reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240124093941.2259199-1-hch@lst.de>
     [not found] ` <be690355-03c6-42e2-a13f-b593ad1c0edd@kernel.dk>
2024-01-25  8:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 16:09     ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-25 16:11       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-25 16:13         ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-26 13:52           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240126135224.GA3368@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox