From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org, hcochran@kernelspring.com, mszeredi@redhat.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] mm: remove redundant check in wb_min_max_ratio
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:33:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240123183332.876854-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240123183332.876854-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
We initialize bdi->max_ratio with a valid value (100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE)
in bdi_init and we always set bdi->max_ratio with a valid value (< 100 *
BDI_RATIO_SCALE) in __bdi_set_max_ratio. So the validation of max_ratio
in wb_min_max_ratio is redundant. Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 5c19ebffe5be..f25393034c76 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -198,10 +198,8 @@ static void wb_min_max_ratio(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
min *= this_bw;
min = div64_ul(min, tot_bw);
}
- if (max < 100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE) {
- max *= this_bw;
- max = div64_ul(max, tot_bw);
- }
+ max *= this_bw;
+ max = div64_ul(max, tot_bw);
}
*minp = min;
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-23 18:33 [PATCH 0/5] Fix and cleanups to page-writeback Kemeng Shi
2024-01-23 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: enable __wb_calc_thresh to calculate dirty background threshold Kemeng Shi
2024-01-23 18:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: correct calculation of cgroup wb's bg_thresh in wb_over_bg_thresh Kemeng Shi
2024-01-23 20:43 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-24 2:01 ` Kemeng Shi
2024-01-29 21:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-08 9:26 ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 19:32 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-18 2:35 ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-20 17:34 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-23 18:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: call __wb_calc_thresh instead of wb_calc_thresh " Kemeng Shi
2024-01-23 18:33 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2024-01-23 18:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty Kemeng Shi
2024-01-23 14:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-23 20:46 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix and cleanups to page-writeback Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240123183332.876854-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hcochran@kernelspring.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox