From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 55/82] kasan: Refactor intentional wrap-around test
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:27:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240123002814.1396804-55-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122235208.work.748-kees@kernel.org>
In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:
VAR + value < VAR
Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow
option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we
want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully
instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they
are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3],
or pointer[4] types.
Refactor open-coded wrap-around addition test to use add_would_overflow().
This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future.
Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4]
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
mm/kasan/generic.c | 2 +-
mm/kasan/sw_tags.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/kasan/generic.c b/mm/kasan/generic.c
index df6627f62402..f9bc29ae09bd 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/generic.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/generic.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static __always_inline bool check_region_inline(const void *addr,
if (unlikely(size == 0))
return true;
- if (unlikely(addr + size < addr))
+ if (unlikely(add_would_overflow(addr, size)))
return !kasan_report(addr, size, write, ret_ip);
if (unlikely(!addr_has_metadata(addr)))
diff --git a/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c b/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c
index 220b5d4c6876..79a3bbd66c32 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ bool kasan_check_range(const void *addr, size_t size, bool write,
if (unlikely(size == 0))
return true;
- if (unlikely(addr + size < addr))
+ if (unlikely(add_would_overflow(addr, size)))
return !kasan_report(addr, size, write, ret_ip);
tag = get_tag((const void *)addr);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240122235208.work.748-kees@kernel.org>
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 33/82] mm/vmalloc: Refactor intentional wrap-around calculation Kees Cook
2024-01-30 18:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-01-30 19:54 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-30 21:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-01-31 9:44 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-23 0:27 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-01-25 22:35 ` [PATCH 55/82] kasan: Refactor intentional wrap-around test Andrey Konovalov
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 56/82] usercopy: " Kees Cook
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 63/82] mm: " Kees Cook
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 78/82] mm/vmalloc: " Kees Cook
2024-01-30 18:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240123002814.1396804-55-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox