Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree

[Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>]

On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 17:36:23 +0100 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Thank you! I tried the patch, and it seems that the wait for rwlock_t
> > also exists, as much as using spinlock_t. (The flamegraph is attached.
> > Not sure why the read_lock waits so long, given that there is no frequent
> > write_lock competition)
> > 
> >                vzalloced shmem(spinlock_t)   vzalloced shmem(rwlock_t)
> > Requests/sec         583729.93                     460007.44
> > 
> > So I guess the overhead in finding vmap area is inevitable here and the
> > original spin_lock is fine in this series.
> > 
> I have also noticed a erformance difference between rwlock and spinlock. 
> So, yes. This is what we need to do extra if CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is
> set, i.e. find a VA.

See if read bias helps to understand the gap between spinlock and rwlock.

--- x/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ y/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ void __lockfunc queued_read_lock_slowpat
 	/*
 	 * Readers come here when they cannot get the lock without waiting
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {
+	if (1) {
 		/*
 		 * Readers in interrupt context will get the lock immediately
 		 * if the writer is just waiting (not holding the lock yet),