From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: shr@devkernel.io, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: fix arithmetic for max_prop_frac when setting max_ratio
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:41:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104174101.oax6zbdhy4v5u4bf@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219142508.86265-3-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
On Tue 19-12-23 22:25:08, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> Since now bdi->max_ratio is part per million, fix the wrong arithmetic
> for max_prop_frac when setting max_ratio. Otherwise the miscalculated
> max_prop_frac will affect the incrementing of writeout completion count
> when max_ratio is not 100%.
>
> Fixes: efc3e6ad53ea ("mm: split off __bdi_set_max_ratio() function")
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Good catch. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 2140382dd768..05e5c425b3ff 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,8 @@ static int __bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int max_ra
> ret = -EINVAL;
> } else {
> bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
> - bdi->max_prop_frac = (FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
> + bdi->max_prop_frac = (FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) /
> + (100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE);
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
>
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 14:25 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: fix arithmetic for bdi min_ratio and max_ratio Jingbo Xu
2023-12-19 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: fix arithmetic for bdi min_ratio Jingbo Xu
2024-01-04 17:33 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-19 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: fix arithmetic for max_prop_frac when setting max_ratio Jingbo Xu
2024-01-04 17:41 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-12-19 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: fix arithmetic for bdi min_ratio and max_ratio Stefan Roesch
2023-12-20 1:43 ` Jingbo Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104174101.oax6zbdhy4v5u4bf@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox