linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
	Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-karma-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] hfs: remove ->writepage
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 05:59:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231215045943.GA16040@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXtRBarvgSVN5zPx@casper.infradead.org>

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 07:01:25PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Was there a reason you only did this for hfs_aops and not for
> hfs_btree_aops?  It feels like anything that just calls
> block_write_full_page() in the writepage handler should be converted
> to just calling mpage_writepages() in the writepages handler.
> I have a few of those conversions done, but obviously they're in
> filesystems that are basically untestable.

Probably.  I remember I had a good reason to skip, and the lack of
testability might have been it.  Note that for hfsplus in particular
we should actually be able to test now that the port of the hfs
userspace has returned to distros.  I haven't actually gotten to
see what the test baseline looks like, though.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-15  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-13 16:28 start removing writepage instances Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-13 16:28 ` [PATCH 1/9] extfat: remove ->writepage Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-14 11:07   ` Namjae Jeon
2022-11-13 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/9] ext2: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-14 10:49   ` Jan Kara
2022-11-16 16:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 18:20       ` [PATCH 2/9] ext2: remove ->writepageo Jan Kara
2022-11-17  6:31         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-21 10:07           ` Jan Kara
2022-11-13 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/9] fat: remove ->writepage Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-13 16:28 ` [PATCH 4/9] hfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-14 19:01   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-15  4:59     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-11-13 16:28 ` [PATCH 5/9] hfsplus: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-13 16:28 ` [PATCH 6/9] hpfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-13 16:29 ` [PATCH 7/9] jfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-14 14:29   ` Dave Kleikamp
2022-11-13 16:29 ` [PATCH 8/9] omfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-15  2:34   ` Bob Copeland
2022-11-13 16:29 ` [PATCH 9/9] udf: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-14 10:52   ` Jan Kara
2022-11-14 20:29 ` start removing writepage instances Johannes Weiner
2022-11-16 18:39 ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-12-02 10:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-17 21:39 ` David Howells
2022-11-17 21:41 ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231215045943.GA16040@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-karma-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
    --cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox