From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, david@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
huzhanyuan@oppo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: avoid fast_isolate_freepages blindly choose improper pageblock
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:02:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231213130231.ksban2ovad4q4rxj@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206110054.61617-1-v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 12:00:54AM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> Testing shows fast_isolate_freepages can blindly choose an unsuitable
> pageblock from time to time particularly while the min mark is used
> from XXX path:
> if (!page) {
> cc->fast_search_fail++;
> if (scan_start) {
> /*
> * Use the highest PFN found above min. If one was
> * not found, be pessimistic for direct compaction
> * and use the min mark.
> */
> if (highest >= min_pfn) {
> page = pfn_to_page(highest);
> cc->free_pfn = highest;
> } else {
> if (cc->direct_compaction && pfn_valid(min_pfn)) { /* XXX */
> page = pageblock_pfn_to_page(min_pfn,
> min(pageblock_end_pfn(min_pfn),
> zone_end_pfn(cc->zone)),
> cc->zone);
> cc->free_pfn = min_pfn;
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> The reason is that no code is doing any check on the min_pfn
> min_pfn = pageblock_start_pfn(cc->free_pfn - (distance >> 1));
>
> In contrast, slow path of isolate_freepages() is always skipping unsuitable
> pageblocks in a decent way.
>
> This issue doesn't happen quite often. When running 25 machines with 16GiB
> memory for one night, most of them can hit this unexpected code path.
> However the frequency isn't like many times per second. It might be one
> time in a couple of hours. Thus, it is very hard to measure the visible
> performance impact in my machines though the affection of choosing the
> unsuitable migration_target should be negative in theory.
>
> I feel it's still worth fixing this to at least make the code theoretically
> self-explanatory as it is quite odd an unsuitable migration_target can be
> still migration_target.
>
> Reported-by: Zhanyuan Hu <huzhanyuan@oppo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 11:00 Barry Song
2023-12-07 1:57 ` Baolin Wang
2023-12-13 13:02 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2023-12-14 1:34 ` Barry Song
2023-12-14 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231213130231.ksban2ovad4q4rxj@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=huzhanyuan@oppo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox