linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	hawk@kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
	linyunsheng@huawei.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/4] page_pool: transition to reference count management after page draining
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 17:38:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231208173816.2f32ad0f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206105419.27952-2-liangchen.linux@gmail.com>

On Wed,  6 Dec 2023 18:54:16 +0800 Liang Chen wrote:
> -/* pp_frag_count represents the number of writers who can update the page
> +/* pp_ref_count represents the number of writers who can update the page
>   * either by updating skb->data or via DMA mappings for the device.
>   * We can't rely on the page refcnt for that as we don't know who might be
>   * holding page references and we can't reliably destroy or sync DMA mappings
>   * of the fragments.
>   *
> - * When pp_frag_count reaches 0 we can either recycle the page if the page
> + * pp_ref_count initially corresponds to the number of fragments. However,
> + * when multiple users start to reference a single fragment, for example in
> + * skb_try_coalesce, the pp_ref_count will become greater than the number of
> + * fragments.
> + *
> + * When pp_ref_count reaches 0 we can either recycle the page if the page
>   * refcnt is 1 or return it back to the memory allocator and destroy any
>   * mappings we have.
>   */

Sorry to nit pick but I think this whole doc has to be rewritten
completely. It does state the most important thing which is that
the caller must have just allocated the page.

How about:

/**
 * page_pool_fragment_page() - split a fresh page into fragments
 * @.. fill these in
 *
 * pp_ref_count represents the number of outstanding references
 * to the page, which will be freed using page_pool APIs (rather
 * than page allocator APIs like put_page()). Such references are
 * usually held by page_pool-aware objects like skbs marked for
 * page pool recycling.
 *
 * This helper allows the caller to take (set) multiple references
 * to a freshly allocated page. The page must be freshly allocated
 * (have a pp_ref_count of 1). This is commonly done by drivers
 * and "fragment allocators" to save atomic operations - either
 * when they know upfront how many references they will need; or
 * to take MAX references and return the unused ones with a single
 * atomic dec(), instead of performing multiple atomic inc()
 * operations.
 */

I think that's more informative at this stage of evolution of
the  page pool API, when most users aren't experts on internals.
But feel free to disagree..

>  static inline void page_pool_fragment_page(struct page *page, long nr)
>  {
> -	atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, nr);
> +	atomic_long_set(&page->pp_ref_count, nr);
>  }

The code itself and rest of the patches LGTM, although it would be
great to get ACKs from pp maintainers..


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-09  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-06 10:54 [PATCH net-next v7 0/4] skbuff: Optimize SKB coalescing for page pool Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/4] page_pool: transition to reference count management after page draining Liang Chen
2023-12-09  1:38   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-12-11  3:31     ` Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/4] page_pool: halve BIAS_MAX for multiple user references of a fragment Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/4] skbuff: Add a function to check if a page belongs to page_pool Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/4] skbuff: Optimization of SKB coalescing for page pool Liang Chen
2023-12-09  2:18   ` Mina Almasry
2023-12-11  3:38     ` Liang Chen
2023-12-11  4:21       ` Mina Almasry
2023-12-11 19:32         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-12-11 20:07           ` Mina Almasry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231208173816.2f32ad0f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox