From: sxwjean@me.com
To: vbabka@suse.cz, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, cl@linux.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, corbet@lwn.net, keescook@chromium.org,
arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: correct the default value of slub_min_objects in doc
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 08:15:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231203001501.126339-4-sxwjean@me.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231203001501.126339-1-sxwjean@me.com>
From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
There is no a value assigned to slub_min_objects by default, it always
is 0 that is initialized by compiler if no assigned value by command line.
min_objects is calculated based on processor numbers in calculate_order().
For more details, see commit 9b2cd506e5f2 ("slub: Calculate min_objects
based on number of processors.")
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
---
Documentation/mm/slub.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/slub.rst b/Documentation/mm/slub.rst
index be75971532f5..1f4399581449 100644
--- a/Documentation/mm/slub.rst
+++ b/Documentation/mm/slub.rst
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ list_lock once in a while to deal with partial slabs. That overhead is
governed by the order of the allocation for each slab. The allocations
can be influenced by kernel parameters:
-.. slub_min_objects=x (default 4)
+.. slub_min_objects=x (default 0)
.. slub_min_order=x (default 0)
.. slub_max_order=x (default 3 (PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-03 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-03 0:14 [PATCH v2 0/3] supplement of slab allocator removal sxwjean
2023-12-03 0:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove noaliencache sxwjean
2023-12-06 15:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-12-03 0:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm/slub: unify all sl[au]b parameters with "slab_$param" sxwjean
2023-12-06 16:14 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-12-08 1:58 ` Song, Xiongwei
2023-12-09 1:02 ` Song, Xiongwei
2023-12-13 11:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-12-03 0:15 ` sxwjean [this message]
2023-12-05 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: correct the default value of slub_min_objects in doc Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-12-05 14:10 ` Song, Xiongwei
2023-12-06 0:22 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-12-06 14:33 ` Song, Xiongwei
2023-12-06 16:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-12-08 23:17 ` Song, Xiongwei
2023-12-06 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] supplement of slab allocator removal Vlastimil Babka
2023-12-08 2:03 ` Song, Xiongwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231203001501.126339-4-sxwjean@me.com \
--to=sxwjean@me.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox