From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, omosnace@redhat.com,
mhocko@suse.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] mm: mempolicy: Revise comment regarding mempolicy mode flags
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:15:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231122141559.4228-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231122141559.4228-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES, MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES, and MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING are
mode flags applicable to both set_mempolicy(2) and mbind(2) system calls.
It's worth noting that MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING was initially introduced in
commit bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on fault among multiple bound
nodes") exclusively for set_mempolicy(2). However, it was later made a
shared flag for both set_mempolicy(2) and mbind(2) following
commit 6d2aec9e123b ("mm/mempolicy: do not allow illegal
MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING | MPOL_LOCAL in mbind()").
This revised version aims to clarify the details regarding the mode flags.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
index a8963f7ef4c2..afed4a45f5b9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ enum {
MPOL_MAX, /* always last member of enum */
};
-/* Flags for set_mempolicy */
+/* Flags for set_mempolicy() or mbind() */
#define MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES (1 << 15)
#define MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (1 << 14)
#define MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING (1 << 13) /* Optimize with NUMA balancing if possible */
--
2.30.1 (Apple Git-130)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 14:15 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf Yafang Shao
2023-11-22 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] mm, doc: Add doc for MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING Yafang Shao
2023-11-23 6:37 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-22 14:15 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2023-11-23 6:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] mm: mempolicy: Revise comment regarding mempolicy mode flags Huang, Ying
2023-11-23 12:21 ` Yafang Shao
2023-11-22 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] mm, security: Fix missed security_task_movememory() in mbind(2) Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231122141559.4228-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox