From: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
To: <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
<hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <mhocko@kernel.org>,
<roman.gushchin@linux.dev>, <shakeelb@google.com>,
<muchun.song@linux.dev>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <kernel@sberdevices.ru>, <rockosov@gmail.com>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: memcg: print out cgroup name in the memcg tracepoints
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:01:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231122100156.6568-2-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231122100156.6568-1-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
Sometimes it is necessary to understand in which memcg tracepoint event
occurred. The function cgroup_name() is a useful tool for this purpose.
To integrate cgroup_name() into the existing memcg tracepoints, this
patch introduces a new tracepoint template for the begin() and end()
events, utilizing static __array() to store the cgroup name.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
---
include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++---
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index d2123dd960d5..9b49cd120ae9 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -141,19 +141,47 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_b
);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
-DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin,
- TP_PROTO(int order, gfp_t gfp_flags),
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin_template,
- TP_ARGS(order, gfp_flags)
+ TP_PROTO(int order, gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg),
+
+ TP_ARGS(order, gfp_flags, memcg),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(int, order)
+ __field(unsigned long, gfp_flags)
+ __array(char, name, NAME_MAX + 1)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->order = order;
+ __entry->gfp_flags = (__force unsigned long)gfp_flags;
+ cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup,
+ __entry->name,
+ sizeof(__entry->name));
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("order=%d gfp_flags=%s memcg=%s",
+ __entry->order,
+ show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags),
+ __entry->name)
);
-DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin,
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin,
- TP_PROTO(int order, gfp_t gfp_flags),
+ TP_PROTO(int order, gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg),
- TP_ARGS(order, gfp_flags)
+ TP_ARGS(order, gfp_flags, memcg)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin,
+
+ TP_PROTO(int order, gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg),
+
+ TP_ARGS(order, gfp_flags, memcg)
);
+
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template,
@@ -181,19 +209,44 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end
);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
-DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end,
- TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end_template,
- TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg),
+
+ TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed, memcg),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, nr_reclaimed)
+ __array(char, name, NAME_MAX + 1)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->nr_reclaimed = nr_reclaimed;
+ cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup,
+ __entry->name,
+ sizeof(__entry->name));
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("nr_reclaimed=%lu memcg=%s",
+ __entry->nr_reclaimed,
+ __entry->name)
);
-DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end,
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end,
- TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg),
- TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
+ TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed, memcg)
);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg),
+
+ TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed, memcg)
+);
+
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 1080209a568b..45780952f4b5 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7088,8 +7088,8 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
- trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin(sc.order,
- sc.gfp_mask);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin(sc.order, sc.gfp_mask,
+ memcg);
/*
* NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
@@ -7100,7 +7100,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
*/
shrink_lruvec(lruvec, &sc);
- trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed, memcg);
*nr_scanned = sc.nr_scanned;
@@ -7134,13 +7134,13 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), sc.gfp_mask);
set_task_reclaim_state(current, &sc.reclaim_state);
- trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin(0, sc.gfp_mask);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin(0, sc.gfp_mask, memcg);
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
- trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end(nr_reclaimed);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end(nr_reclaimed, memcg);
set_task_reclaim_state(current, NULL);
return nr_reclaimed;
--
2.36.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 10:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: memcg: improve vmscan tracepoints Dmitry Rokosov
2023-11-22 10:01 ` Dmitry Rokosov [this message]
2023-11-23 7:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: memcg: print out cgroup name in the memcg tracepoints Shakeel Butt
2023-11-23 8:03 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-11-23 8:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2023-11-23 8:45 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-11-23 11:21 ` Dmitry Rokosov
[not found] ` <20231122100156.6568-3-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
2023-11-22 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: memcg: introduce new event to trace shrink_memcg Michal Hocko
2023-11-22 10:58 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-11-22 13:24 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-22 18:57 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-11-23 11:26 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-11-27 9:25 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231122100156.6568-2-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com \
--to=ddrokosov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rockosov@gmail.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox