* [PATCH 0/2] check MGLRU promoted without hold page lock @ 2023-10-20 8:43 Huan Yang 2023-10-20 8:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace Huan Yang 2023-10-20 8:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: move promoted folio out of lock Huan Yang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Huan Yang @ 2023-10-20 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yu Zhao, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Huan Yang, Suren Baghdasaryan, Vlastimil Babka, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm Cc: opensource.kernel This patchset add a new reclaim_stat named nr_promote to observe number folios which MGLRU promoted before shrink touch, and then show in mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive. Also, fix nr_scanned in MGLRU trace into nr_taken. (patch1) Base this trace, here are many folio promoted before shrink touch, so, due to the high frequence, move this check before hold page lock is better.(patch2) Due to we will not actually touch this folio, nr_promote trace is unnecessary, remove this trace. This patchset based on link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231018082104.3918770-1-link@vivo.com/ Which have many mistake pointed by Yu Zhao.(thanks) Huan Yang (2): tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace mm: multi-gen LRU: move promoted folio out of lock include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 3 ++- mm/vmscan.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace 2023-10-20 8:43 [PATCH 0/2] check MGLRU promoted without hold page lock Huan Yang @ 2023-10-20 8:43 ` Huan Yang 2023-10-20 8:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: move promoted folio out of lock Huan Yang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Huan Yang @ 2023-10-20 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yu Zhao, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Huan Yang, Suren Baghdasaryan, Vlastimil Babka, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm Cc: opensource.kernel This patch add reclaim stat: nr_promote: nr_pages shrink before promote by folio_update_gen. And then, use correct nr_scanned which evict_folios passed into trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive. Mistake info like this: ``` kswapd0-89 [000] 64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC ``` Correct info like this: ``` <...>-9041 [006] 43.738481: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: nid=0 nr_scanned=13 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=9 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 nr_promote=4 priority=12 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC ``` Signed-off-by: Huan Yang <link@vivo.com> --- include/linux/vmstat.h | 1 + include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 7 +++++-- mm/vmscan.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h index fed855bae6d8..a3710ce08434 100644 --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct reclaim_stat { unsigned nr_ref_keep; unsigned nr_unmap_fail; unsigned nr_lazyfree_fail; + unsigned nr_promote; }; enum writeback_stat_item { diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h index 1a488c30afa5..ffcf288879e0 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive, __field(unsigned int, nr_activate1) __field(unsigned long, nr_ref_keep) __field(unsigned long, nr_unmap_fail) + __field(unsigned long, nr_promote) __field(int, priority) __field(int, reclaim_flags) ), @@ -382,18 +383,20 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive, __entry->nr_activate1 = stat->nr_activate[1]; __entry->nr_ref_keep = stat->nr_ref_keep; __entry->nr_unmap_fail = stat->nr_unmap_fail; + __entry->nr_promote = stat->nr_promote; __entry->priority = priority; __entry->reclaim_flags = trace_reclaim_flags(file); ), - TP_printk("nid=%d nr_scanned=%ld nr_reclaimed=%ld nr_dirty=%ld nr_writeback=%ld nr_congested=%ld nr_immediate=%ld nr_activate_anon=%d nr_activate_file=%d nr_ref_keep=%ld nr_unmap_fail=%ld priority=%d flags=%s", + TP_printk("nid=%d nr_scanned=%ld nr_reclaimed=%ld nr_dirty=%ld nr_writeback=%ld nr_congested=%ld nr_immediate=%ld nr_activate_anon=%d" + " nr_activate_file=%d nr_ref_keep=%ld nr_unmap_fail=%ld nr_promote=%ld priority=%d flags=%s", __entry->nid, __entry->nr_scanned, __entry->nr_reclaimed, __entry->nr_dirty, __entry->nr_writeback, __entry->nr_congested, __entry->nr_immediate, __entry->nr_activate0, __entry->nr_activate1, __entry->nr_ref_keep, __entry->nr_unmap_fail, - __entry->priority, + __entry->nr_promote, __entry->priority, show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags)) ); diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 2cc0cb41fb32..fb5df298c955 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1063,8 +1063,10 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, /* folio_update_gen() tried to promote this page? */ if (lru_gen_enabled() && !ignore_references && - folio_mapped(folio) && folio_test_referenced(folio)) + folio_mapped(folio) && folio_test_referenced(folio)) { + stat->nr_promote += nr_pages; goto keep_locked; + } /* * The number of dirty pages determines if a node is marked @@ -4495,6 +4497,8 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap int type; int scanned; int reclaimed; + unsigned long nr_taken = sc->nr_scanned; + unsigned int total_reclaimed = 0; LIST_HEAD(list); LIST_HEAD(clean); struct folio *folio; @@ -4521,10 +4525,7 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap return scanned; retry: reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false); - sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed; - trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id, - scanned, reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority, - type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON); + total_reclaimed += reclaimed; list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(folio, next, &list, lru) { if (!folio_evictable(folio)) { @@ -4582,6 +4583,20 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap goto retry; } + /** + * MGLRU scan_folios return nr_scanned no only contains + * isolated folios. To get actually touched folios in + * shrink_folios_list, we can record last nr_scanned which + * sc saved, and sc nr_scanned will update for each folios + * which we touched. New count sub last can get right nr_taken + */ + nr_taken = sc->nr_scanned - nr_taken; + + sc->nr_reclaimed += total_reclaimed; + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, + total_reclaimed, &stat, + sc->priority, type); + return scanned; } -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: move promoted folio out of lock 2023-10-20 8:43 [PATCH 0/2] check MGLRU promoted without hold page lock Huan Yang 2023-10-20 8:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace Huan Yang @ 2023-10-20 8:43 ` Huan Yang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Huan Yang @ 2023-10-20 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yu Zhao, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Huan Yang, Suren Baghdasaryan, Vlastimil Babka, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm Cc: opensource.kernel With nr_prmote trace, show that here are many folio promoted before shrink check. I just test by below cmd, and grep nr_reclaimed=0: ``` trace-cmd record -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive\ stressapptest -M 8096 -s 120 -m 1 -W trace-cmd report | grep "nr_reclaim\=0" ``` Then find many show like below: ``` <...>-9042 [001] 43.290759: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=1 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 nr_promote=63 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC ``` Many scanned folio is promoted ahead. So, this promoted check better checked before trylock folio. And, now that promoted alread checked before touch, no need to trace it anymore, remove this trace. Signed-off-by: Huan Yang <link@vivo.com> --- include/linux/vmstat.h | 1 - include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 6 ++---- mm/vmscan.c | 12 +++++------- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h index a3710ce08434..fed855bae6d8 100644 --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ struct reclaim_stat { unsigned nr_ref_keep; unsigned nr_unmap_fail; unsigned nr_lazyfree_fail; - unsigned nr_promote; }; enum writeback_stat_item { diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h index ffcf288879e0..41964d6e8dd1 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h @@ -366,7 +366,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive, __field(unsigned int, nr_activate1) __field(unsigned long, nr_ref_keep) __field(unsigned long, nr_unmap_fail) - __field(unsigned long, nr_promote) __field(int, priority) __field(int, reclaim_flags) ), @@ -383,20 +382,19 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive, __entry->nr_activate1 = stat->nr_activate[1]; __entry->nr_ref_keep = stat->nr_ref_keep; __entry->nr_unmap_fail = stat->nr_unmap_fail; - __entry->nr_promote = stat->nr_promote; __entry->priority = priority; __entry->reclaim_flags = trace_reclaim_flags(file); ), TP_printk("nid=%d nr_scanned=%ld nr_reclaimed=%ld nr_dirty=%ld nr_writeback=%ld nr_congested=%ld nr_immediate=%ld nr_activate_anon=%d" - " nr_activate_file=%d nr_ref_keep=%ld nr_unmap_fail=%ld nr_promote=%ld priority=%d flags=%s", + " nr_activate_file=%d nr_ref_keep=%ld nr_unmap_fail=%ld priority=%d flags=%s", __entry->nid, __entry->nr_scanned, __entry->nr_reclaimed, __entry->nr_dirty, __entry->nr_writeback, __entry->nr_congested, __entry->nr_immediate, __entry->nr_activate0, __entry->nr_activate1, __entry->nr_ref_keep, __entry->nr_unmap_fail, - __entry->nr_promote, __entry->priority, + __entry->priority, show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags)) ); diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index fb5df298c955..98a7b0f738bd 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1045,6 +1045,11 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, folio = lru_to_folio(folio_list); list_del(&folio->lru); + /* folio_update_gen() tried to promote this page? */ + if (lru_gen_enabled() && !ignore_references && + folio_mapped(folio) && folio_test_referenced(folio)) + goto keep; + if (!folio_trylock(folio)) goto keep; @@ -1061,13 +1066,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, if (!sc->may_unmap && folio_mapped(folio)) goto keep_locked; - /* folio_update_gen() tried to promote this page? */ - if (lru_gen_enabled() && !ignore_references && - folio_mapped(folio) && folio_test_referenced(folio)) { - stat->nr_promote += nr_pages; - goto keep_locked; - } - /* * The number of dirty pages determines if a node is marked * reclaim_congested. kswapd will stall and start writing -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] some fix of multi-gen lru @ 2023-10-18 8:20 Huan Yang 2023-10-18 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace Huan Yang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Huan Yang @ 2023-10-18 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yu Zhao, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Huan Yang, Suren Baghdasaryan, Vlastimil Babka, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm, bpf Cc: opensource.kernel For multi-gen lru shrink_inactive trace, here are some mistake: First, nr_scanned in evict_folios means all folios which it touched in `get_nr_to_scan`(so not means nr_taken). So, we may get some info from trace like this: ``` kswapd0-89 [000] 64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC ``` Actually, we don't taken too much folios in shrink. This patch use difference between before sc->nr_scanned and after shrink to replace nr_taken and pass this to shrink_inactive tracing. Second, also like above info, we can't get nr_folios going to where, actually in multi-gen lru shrink, many keep by folio_update_gen when look around or other promote this folio. Third, evict_folios don't gather reclaim_stat info after shrink list, so, dirty\writeback\congested stat will miss, and we can't control LRUVEC_CONGESTED or reclaim_throttle. Patch 1 aim to resolve first and second, patch 2 resolve third. Huan Yang (2): tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace mm: multi-gen lru: fix stat count include/linux/vmstat.h | 2 ++ include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 8 ++++- mm/vmscan.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace 2023-10-18 8:20 [PATCH 0/2] some fix of multi-gen lru Huan Yang @ 2023-10-18 8:20 ` Huan Yang 2023-10-18 16:28 ` Yu Zhao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Huan Yang @ 2023-10-18 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yu Zhao, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Suren Baghdasaryan, Huan Yang, Vlastimil Babka, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm, bpf Cc: opensource.kernel This patch add two reclaim stat: nr_promote: nr_pages shrink before promote by folio_update_gen. nr_demote: nr_pages NUMA demotion passed. And then, use correct nr_scanned which evict_folios passed into trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive. Mistake info like this: ``` kswapd0-89 [000] 64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC ``` Correct info like this: ``` <...>-9041 [006] 43.738481: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: nid=0 nr_scanned=13 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=9 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 nr_promote=4 nr_demote=0 priority=12 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC ``` Signed-off-by: Huan Yang <link@vivo.com> --- include/linux/vmstat.h | 2 ++ include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 8 +++++++- mm/vmscan.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h index fed855bae6d8..ac2dd9168780 100644 --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ struct reclaim_stat { unsigned nr_ref_keep; unsigned nr_unmap_fail; unsigned nr_lazyfree_fail; + unsigned nr_promote; + unsigned nr_demote; }; enum writeback_stat_item { diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h index 1a488c30afa5..9b403824a293 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h @@ -366,6 +366,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive, __field(unsigned int, nr_activate1) __field(unsigned long, nr_ref_keep) __field(unsigned long, nr_unmap_fail) + __field(unsigned long, nr_promote) + __field(unsigned long, nr_demote) __field(int, priority) __field(int, reclaim_flags) ), @@ -382,17 +384,21 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive, __entry->nr_activate1 = stat->nr_activate[1]; __entry->nr_ref_keep = stat->nr_ref_keep; __entry->nr_unmap_fail = stat->nr_unmap_fail; + __entry->nr_promote = stat->nr_promote; + __entry->nr_demote = stat->nr_demote; __entry->priority = priority; __entry->reclaim_flags = trace_reclaim_flags(file); ), - TP_printk("nid=%d nr_scanned=%ld nr_reclaimed=%ld nr_dirty=%ld nr_writeback=%ld nr_congested=%ld nr_immediate=%ld nr_activate_anon=%d nr_activate_file=%d nr_ref_keep=%ld nr_unmap_fail=%ld priority=%d flags=%s", + TP_printk("nid=%d nr_scanned=%ld nr_reclaimed=%ld nr_dirty=%ld nr_writeback=%ld nr_congested=%ld nr_immediate=%ld nr_activate_anon=%d" + " nr_activate_file=%d nr_ref_keep=%ld nr_unmap_fail=%ld nr_promote=%ld nr_demote=%ld priority=%d flags=%s", __entry->nid, __entry->nr_scanned, __entry->nr_reclaimed, __entry->nr_dirty, __entry->nr_writeback, __entry->nr_congested, __entry->nr_immediate, __entry->nr_activate0, __entry->nr_activate1, __entry->nr_ref_keep, __entry->nr_unmap_fail, + __entry->nr_promote, __entry->nr_demote, __entry->priority, show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags)) ); diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 2cc0cb41fb32..21099b9f21e0 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1063,8 +1063,10 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, /* folio_update_gen() tried to promote this page? */ if (lru_gen_enabled() && !ignore_references && - folio_mapped(folio) && folio_test_referenced(folio)) + folio_mapped(folio) && folio_test_referenced(folio)) { + stat->nr_promote += nr_pages; goto keep_locked; + } /* * The number of dirty pages determines if a node is marked @@ -1193,6 +1195,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, (thp_migration_supported() || !folio_test_large(folio))) { list_add(&folio->lru, &demote_folios); folio_unlock(folio); + stat->nr_demote += nr_pages; continue; } @@ -4495,6 +4498,8 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap int type; int scanned; int reclaimed; + unsigned long nr_taken = sc->nr_scanned; + unsigned int total_reclaimed = 0; LIST_HEAD(list); LIST_HEAD(clean); struct folio *folio; @@ -4521,10 +4526,7 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap return scanned; retry: reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false); - sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed; - trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id, - scanned, reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority, - type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON); + total_reclaimed += reclaimed; list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(folio, next, &list, lru) { if (!folio_evictable(folio)) { @@ -4582,6 +4584,20 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap goto retry; } + /** + * MGLRU scan_folios return nr_scanned no only contains + * isolated folios. To get actually touched folios in + * shrink_folios_list, we can record last nr_scanned which + * sc saved, and sc nr_scanned will update for each folios + * which we touched. New count sub last can get right nr_taken + */ + nr_taken = sc->nr_scanned - nr_taken; + + sc->nr_reclaimed += total_reclaimed; + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, + total_reclaimed, &stat, + sc->priority, type); + return scanned; } -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace 2023-10-18 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace Huan Yang @ 2023-10-18 16:28 ` Yu Zhao 2023-10-19 2:24 ` Huan Yang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Yu Zhao @ 2023-10-18 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Huan Yang, Jaewon Kim, Kalesh Singh Cc: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Suren Baghdasaryan, Vlastimil Babka, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm, bpf, opensource.kernel On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:22 AM Huan Yang <link@vivo.com> wrote: > > This patch add two reclaim stat: > nr_promote: nr_pages shrink before promote by folio_update_gen. > nr_demote: nr_pages NUMA demotion passed. The above isn't specific to MLGRU, so they should be in a separate patchset. > And then, use correct nr_scanned which evict_folios passed into > trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive. > > Mistake info like this: > ``` > kswapd0-89 [000] 64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: > nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 > nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 > nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4 > flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC > ``` > Correct info like this: > ``` > <...>-9041 [006] 43.738481: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: > nid=0 nr_scanned=13 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 > nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=9 nr_activate_file=0 > nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 nr_promote=4 nr_demote=0 priority=12 > flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC > ``` Adding Jaewon & Kalesh to take a look. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace 2023-10-18 16:28 ` Yu Zhao @ 2023-10-19 2:24 ` Huan Yang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Huan Yang @ 2023-10-19 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yu Zhao, Jaewon Kim, Kalesh Singh Cc: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Suren Baghdasaryan, Vlastimil Babka, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm, bpf, opensource.kernel 在 2023/10/19 0:28, Yu Zhao 写道: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:22 AM Huan Yang <link@vivo.com> wrote: >> This patch add two reclaim stat: >> nr_promote: nr_pages shrink before promote by folio_update_gen. >> nr_demote: nr_pages NUMA demotion passed. > The above isn't specific to MLGRU, so they should be in a separate patchset. OK, nr_demote isn't MGLRU, separate is good, but, if this, nr_demote isn't need by myself, I just add this when I see this code. :) Please see nr_promote and nr_scanned fix is MGLRU need? > >> And then, use correct nr_scanned which evict_folios passed into >> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive. >> >> Mistake info like this: >> ``` >> kswapd0-89 [000] 64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: >> nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 >> nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 >> nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4 >> flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC >> ``` >> Correct info like this: >> ``` >> <...>-9041 [006] 43.738481: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive: >> nid=0 nr_scanned=13 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 >> nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=9 nr_activate_file=0 >> nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 nr_promote=4 nr_demote=0 priority=12 >> flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC >> ``` > Adding Jaewon & Kalesh to take a look. Thanks, Huan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-20 8:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-10-20 8:43 [PATCH 0/2] check MGLRU promoted without hold page lock Huan Yang 2023-10-20 8:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace Huan Yang 2023-10-20 8:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: move promoted folio out of lock Huan Yang -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2023-10-18 8:20 [PATCH 0/2] some fix of multi-gen lru Huan Yang 2023-10-18 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace Huan Yang 2023-10-18 16:28 ` Yu Zhao 2023-10-19 2:24 ` Huan Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox