From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev
To: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] slub: Optimize deactivate_slab()
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 15:44:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231017154439.3036608-4-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017154439.3036608-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Since the introduce of unfrozen slabs on cpu partial list, we don't
need to synchronize the slab frozen state under the node list_lock.
The caller of deactivate_slab() and the caller of __slab_free() won't
manipulate the slab list concurrently.
So we can get node list_lock in the stage three if we need to manipulate
the slab list in this path.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 27eac93baa13..5a9711b35c74 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2520,10 +2520,8 @@ static void init_kmem_cache_cpus(struct kmem_cache *s)
static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
void *freelist)
{
- enum slab_modes { M_NONE, M_PARTIAL, M_FREE, M_FULL_NOLIST };
struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, slab_nid(slab));
int free_delta = 0;
- enum slab_modes mode = M_NONE;
void *nextfree, *freelist_iter, *freelist_tail;
int tail = DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD;
unsigned long flags = 0;
@@ -2570,58 +2568,40 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
* unfrozen and number of objects in the slab may have changed.
* Then release lock and retry cmpxchg again.
*/
-redo:
-
- old.freelist = READ_ONCE(slab->freelist);
- old.counters = READ_ONCE(slab->counters);
- VM_BUG_ON(!old.frozen);
-
- /* Determine target state of the slab */
- new.counters = old.counters;
- if (freelist_tail) {
- new.inuse -= free_delta;
- set_freepointer(s, freelist_tail, old.freelist);
- new.freelist = freelist;
- } else
- new.freelist = old.freelist;
+ do {
+ old.freelist = READ_ONCE(slab->freelist);
+ old.counters = READ_ONCE(slab->counters);
+ VM_BUG_ON(!old.frozen);
+
+ /* Determine target state of the slab */
+ new.counters = old.counters;
+ new.frozen = 0;
+ if (freelist_tail) {
+ new.inuse -= free_delta;
+ set_freepointer(s, freelist_tail, old.freelist);
+ new.freelist = freelist;
+ } else
+ new.freelist = old.freelist;
- new.frozen = 0;
+ } while (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
+ old.freelist, old.counters,
+ new.freelist, new.counters,
+ "unfreezing slab"));
+ /*
+ * Stage three: Manipulate the slab list based on the updated state.
+ */
if (!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial) {
- mode = M_FREE;
+ stat(s, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
+ discard_slab(s, slab);
+ stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
} else if (new.freelist) {
- mode = M_PARTIAL;
- /*
- * Taking the spinlock removes the possibility that
- * acquire_slab() will see a slab that is frozen
- */
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
- } else {
- mode = M_FULL_NOLIST;
- }
-
-
- if (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
- old.freelist, old.counters,
- new.freelist, new.counters,
- "unfreezing slab")) {
- if (mode == M_PARTIAL)
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
- goto redo;
- }
-
-
- if (mode == M_PARTIAL) {
add_partial(n, slab, tail);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
stat(s, tail);
- } else if (mode == M_FREE) {
- stat(s, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
- discard_slab(s, slab);
- stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
- } else if (mode == M_FULL_NOLIST) {
+ } else
stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
- }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-17 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 15:44 [RFC PATCH 0/5] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs chengming.zhou
2023-10-17 15:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] slub: Introduce on_partial() chengming.zhou
2023-10-17 15:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-10-18 7:37 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-27 5:26 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-27 9:43 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-17 15:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] slub: Don't manipulate slab list when used by cpu chengming.zhou
2023-10-17 15:44 ` chengming.zhou [this message]
2023-10-17 15:44 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] slub: Don't freeze slabs for cpu partial chengming.zhou
2023-10-17 15:44 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] slub: Introduce get_cpu_partial() chengming.zhou
2023-10-18 6:34 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-10-18 7:44 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231017154439.3036608-4-chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox