linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, riel@surriel.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeelb@google.com,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com,
	shuah@kernel.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, yosryahmed@google.com,
	fvdl@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 15:46:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231004194630.GC39112@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004193622.900383-1-nphamcs@gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 12:36:22PM -0700, Nhat Pham wrote:
> For most migration use cases, only transfer the memcg data from the old
> folio to the new folio, and clear the old folio's memcg data. No
> charging and uncharging will be done.
> 
> This shaves off some work on the migration path, and avoids the
> temporary double charging of a folio during its migration.
> 
> The only exception is replace_page_cache_folio(), which will use the old
> mem_cgroup_migrate() (now renamed to mem_cgroup_replace_folio). In that
> context, the isolation of the old page isn't quite as thorough as with
> migration, so we cannot use our new implementation directly.
> 
> This patch is the result of the following discussion on the new hugetlb
> memcg accounting behavior:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231003171329.GB314430@monkey/
> 
> This should be added as the second prep patch in the following series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231003001828.2554080-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/
> (hugetlb memcg accounting)
> 
> and should go right before the following patch:
> hugetlb: memcg: account hugetlb-backed memory in memory controller
> 
> Reported-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231003171329.GB314430@monkey/

These two tags shouldn't be here, but in the fixlet instead. This is
the dependency patch. Otherwise looks good to me:

> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-04 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 19:36 Nhat Pham
2023-10-04 19:46 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2023-10-04 19:53   ` Nhat Pham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231004194630.GC39112@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox