From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55036E78480 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6B3116B014E; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 647736B0187; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:00:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 503DA6B0188; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:00:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAFB6B014E for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1287C0224 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:00:41 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81297809082.28.5EA4C90 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E042A002C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf15.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=VE3OMg+Z; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf15.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 145.40.73.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1696186838; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=lc37+9Wf6oT4IK3MkJtkwXsbvBv8PcMeKjjthDFjYkA=; b=Ya1Lg0hYwEWlOrnlaGYDzoqrYu5hthv5hZMt9PWcDsaZt7/3xpuiFWJmNm+3om1EFyWUti 95NQ8VOhIa5KhWVx5/JCEbCz/DMCvxTFTli3ITfMrr/M0X9EUTqn8ZbbDQygNxcrxMllCN r+1TIKOGecXbdEgy7MynGoznAizdPRA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf15.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=VE3OMg+Z; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf15.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 145.40.73.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1696186838; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tG6bQpaaQRHcceUWE6cfGtlP7kTj7tJcyj/hJQQFAtHGVWTNt/FheGfA41cJQXfXXJcESx 1JCr2vLNBYQ56Wnhj0EwM8p0NZrMmsZkte7rPEWkk5N+BsmOk3Sm4z8H5bac0pw51oAegx wN6bkdZ5AgjPEmc5uvgKd0Hf10piDXQ= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC742CE0B39; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2015AC433C7; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:00:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696186833; bh=eyERj5WSKcvnTl8jgW5kdCQQLtX0BPFCZgQLqomhC7g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VE3OMg+ZERwDJW+h0DpZSw8vZfHcqn2A4nLRIibtTJFDmeHLgVY/6X0ft6wUYNOuV VYL6VgPlVx3CjnborcbvzdQGs6t3R6ZNgz5yybE/wy+dAV810RsQPi+Z8Lip1YtKC/ d1212UCgQDvvFLR4AtJh6wTLq34aF90QO4Quh2HX0ch5aJ7DMBU6k45KA/hrrcy6el IlWxaXtE7jZuiq4gIHHVqS3oo37tfhiJjGJcL6uZ4G+TxpbT9VOxSohsSJ640yTKD9 X8xWyjbpmCiUNhutDoeT1FZDO50j0Opuf2gZrXWZVfJXfAinkGeENNG2Y5cYpFnwBI fPAu7SdSEQsTg== Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:59:34 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Yajun Deng Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: Init page count in reserve_bootmem_region when MEMINIT_EARLY Message-ID: <20231001185934.GX3303@kernel.org> References: <20230928083302.386202-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> <20230928083302.386202-3-yajun.deng@linux.dev> <20230929083018.GU3303@kernel.org> <20230929100252.GW3303@kernel.org> <15233624-f32e-172e-b2f6-7ca7bffbc96d@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15233624-f32e-172e-b2f6-7ca7bffbc96d@linux.dev> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1E042A002C X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Stat-Signature: iymugsfghhkczurtquyxndcd5gik8ji7 X-HE-Tag: 1696186837-361102 X-HE-Meta: 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 cTpNETjp axVRDz7gdIP+HPpKaZjjNngxTDV+QkK6VYoqjvUiPH9rh02ygxQvYPT3/0/K5dF8UA+fJtqyl4UACcep0fTChmT3NoOQn17L4D6qe152oOCAcmQH6J2gUQ6fWlEROx9XQrdccPoxZtG+95LOW9RwfWue08TGANy5yiijuXbfeJpjEyOSrxVmO7a/b/o/q7s3VulT0CtdHNWKp2psv93DtnXE47VjdiH47BfU7mEjaqfjyXtlVjnxhTmO07sHkf3BHgDaHMwsSFtsGaXxqucdvSKg8EQnhelMiedl7rtj4P8BwNDg= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 06:27:25PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote: > > On 2023/9/29 18:02, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 05:50:40PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote: > > > On 2023/9/29 16:30, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 04:33:02PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote: > > > > > memmap_init_range() would init page count of all pages, but the free > > > > > pages count would be reset in __free_pages_core(). There are opposite > > > > > operations. It's unnecessary and time-consuming when it's MEMINIT_EARLY > > > > > context. > > > > > > > > > > Init page count in reserve_bootmem_region when in MEMINIT_EARLY context, > > > > > and check the page count before reset it. > > > > > > > > > > At the same time, the INIT_LIST_HEAD in reserve_bootmem_region isn't > > > > > need, as it already done in __init_single_page. > > > > > > > > > > The following data was tested on an x86 machine with 190GB of RAM. > > > > > > > > > > before: > > > > > free_low_memory_core_early() 341ms > > > > > > > > > > after: > > > > > free_low_memory_core_early() 285ms > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng > > > > > --- > > > > > v4: same with v2. > > > > > v3: same with v2. > > > > > v2: check page count instead of check context before reset it. > > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230922070923.355656-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev/ > > > > > --- > > > > > mm/mm_init.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- > > > > > mm/page_alloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > > > > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c > > > > > index 9716c8a7ade9..3ab8861e1ef3 100644 > > > > > --- a/mm/mm_init.c > > > > > +++ b/mm/mm_init.c > > > > > @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static void __meminit init_reserved_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid) > > > > > if (zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn)) > > > > > break; > > > > > } > > > > > - __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zid, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT); > > > > > + __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zid, nid, 0); > > > > > } > > > > > #else > > > > > static inline void pgdat_set_deferred_range(pg_data_t *pgdat) {} > > > > > @@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ void __meminit reserve_bootmem_region(phys_addr_t start, > > > > > init_reserved_page(start_pfn, nid); > > > > > - /* Avoid false-positive PageTail() */ > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru); > > > > > + /* Init page count for reserved region */ > > > > Please add a comment that describes _why_ we initialize the page count here. > > > Okay. > > > > > + init_page_count(page); > > > > > /* > > > > > * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct > > > > > @@ -888,9 +888,17 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_range(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone > > > > > } > > > > > page = pfn_to_page(pfn); > > > > > - __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT); > > > > > - if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) > > > > > + > > > > > + /* If the context is MEMINIT_EARLY, we will init page count and > > > > > + * mark page reserved in reserve_bootmem_region, the free region > > > > > + * wouldn't have page count and we will check the pages count > > > > > + * in __free_pages_core. > > > > > + */ > > > > > + __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, 0); > > > > > + if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) { > > > > > + init_page_count(page); > > > > > __SetPageReserved(page); > > > > Rather than calling init_page_count() and __SetPageReserved() for > > > > MEMINIT_HOTPLUG you can set flags to INIT_PAGE_COUNT | INIT_PAGE_RESERVED > > > > an call __init_single_page() after the check for MEMINIT_HOTPLUG. > > > No, the following code would cost more time than the current code in > > > memmap_init(). > > > > > > if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) > > > > > > __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT | INIT_PAGE_RESERVED); > > > else > > > > > > __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, 0); > > Sorry if I wasn't clear. What I meant was to have something along these lines: > > > > enum page_init_flags flags = 0; > > > > if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) > > flags = INIT_PAGE_COUNT | INIT_PAGE_RESERVED; > > __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, flags); > > > Okay, I'll test the time consumed in memmap_init(). > > > > But more generally, I wonder if we have to differentiate HOTPLUG here at all. > > > > @David, can you comment please? > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > /* > > > > > * Usually, we want to mark the pageblock MIGRATE_MOVABLE, > > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > > index 06be8821d833..b868caabe8dc 100644 > > > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > > @@ -1285,18 +1285,22 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order) > > > > > unsigned int loop; > > > > > /* > > > > > - * When initializing the memmap, __init_single_page() sets the refcount > > > > > - * of all pages to 1 ("allocated"/"not free"). We have to set the > > > > > - * refcount of all involved pages to 0. > > > > > + * When initializing the memmap, memmap_init_range sets the refcount > > > > > + * of all pages to 1 ("reserved" and "free") in hotplug context. We > > > > > + * have to set the refcount of all involved pages to 0. Otherwise, > > > > > + * we don't do it, as reserve_bootmem_region only set the refcount on > > > > > + * reserve region ("reserved") in early context. > > > > > */ > > > > Again, why hotplug and early init should be different? > > > I will add a comment that describes it will save boot time. > > But why do we need initialize struct pages differently at boot time vs > > memory hotplug? > > Is there a reason memory hotplug cannot have page count set to 0 just like > > for pages reserved at boot time? > > This patch just save boot time in MEMINIT_EARLY. If someone finds out that > it can save time in > > MEMINIT_HOTPLUG, I think it can be done in another patch later. I just > keeping it in the same. But it's not the same. It becomes slower after your patch and the code that frees the pages for MEMINIT_EARLY and MEMINIT_HOTPLUG becomes non-uniform for no apparent reason. The if (page_count(page)) is really non-obvious... > > > > > - prefetchw(p); > > > > > - for (loop = 0; loop < (nr_pages - 1); loop++, p++) { > > > > > - prefetchw(p + 1); > > > > > + if (page_count(page)) { > > > > > + prefetchw(p); > > > > > + for (loop = 0; loop < (nr_pages - 1); loop++, p++) { > > > > > + prefetchw(p + 1); > > > > > + __ClearPageReserved(p); > > > > > + set_page_count(p, 0); > > > > > + } > > > > > __ClearPageReserved(p); > > > > > set_page_count(p, 0); > > > > > } > > > > > - __ClearPageReserved(p); > > > > > - set_page_count(p, 0); > > > > > atomic_long_add(nr_pages, &page_zone(page)->managed_pages); > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.