linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mm/kmemleak: fix print format of pointer in pr_debug()
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:59:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927035923.1425340-4-liushixin2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927035923.1425340-1-liushixin2@huawei.com>

With 0x%p, the pointer will be hashed and print (____ptrval____) instead.
And with 0x%pa, the pointer can be successfully printed but with duplicate
prefixes, which looks like:

 kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0x(____ptrval____))
 kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0x0000000a1af86000)

Use %pa instead of 0x%p or 0x%pa to print the pointer, and use 0x%px for
__percpu pointer to prevent crash. Then the print will be like:

 kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0xffff9111c145b020)
 kmemleak: kmemleak_free_percpu(0x00000000000333b0)
 kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0000000a1af80000)

Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
---
 mm/kmemleak.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 5a2bbd85df57..c1053db98f55 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static void object_no_scan(unsigned long ptr)
 void __ref kmemleak_alloc(const void *ptr, size_t size, int min_count,
 			  gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p, %zu, %d)\n", __func__, ptr, size, min_count);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa, %zu, %d)\n", __func__, ptr, size, min_count);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		create_object((unsigned long)ptr, size, min_count, gfp);
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ void __ref kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size,
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p, %zu)\n", __func__, ptr, size);
+	pr_debug("%s(0x%px, %zu)\n", __func__, ptr, size);
 
 	/*
 	 * Percpu allocations are only scanned and not reported as leaks
@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmemleak_alloc_percpu);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_vmalloc(const struct vm_struct *area, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p, %zu)\n", __func__, area, size);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa, %zu)\n", __func__, area, size);
 
 	/*
 	 * A min_count = 2 is needed because vm_struct contains a reference to
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmemleak_vmalloc);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_free(const void *ptr)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, ptr);
 
 	if (kmemleak_free_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		delete_object_full((unsigned long)ptr);
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmemleak_free);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_free_part(const void *ptr, size_t size)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, ptr);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		delete_object_part((unsigned long)ptr, size, false);
@@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ void __ref kmemleak_free_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(0x%px)\n", __func__, ptr);
 
 	if (kmemleak_free_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ void __ref kmemleak_update_trace(const void *ptr)
 	struct kmemleak_object *object;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, ptr);
 
 	if (!kmemleak_enabled || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptr))
 		return;
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_update_trace);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_not_leak(const void *ptr)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, ptr);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		make_gray_object((unsigned long)ptr);
@@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_not_leak);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_ignore(const void *ptr)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, ptr)	;
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		make_black_object((unsigned long)ptr, false);
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_ignore);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_scan_area(const void *ptr, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, ptr);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && size && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		add_scan_area((unsigned long)ptr, size, gfp);
@@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_scan_area);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_no_scan(const void *ptr)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%p)\n", __func__, ptr);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, ptr);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
 		object_no_scan((unsigned long)ptr);
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_no_scan);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_alloc_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%pa, %zu)\n", __func__, &phys, size);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa, %zu)\n", __func__, &phys, size);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled)
 		/*
@@ -1229,7 +1229,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_alloc_phys);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_free_part_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%pa)\n", __func__, &phys);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, &phys);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled)
 		delete_object_part((unsigned long)phys, size, true);
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_free_part_phys);
  */
 void __ref kmemleak_ignore_phys(phys_addr_t phys)
 {
-	pr_debug("%s(0x%pa)\n", __func__, &phys);
+	pr_debug("%s(%pa)\n", __func__, &phys);
 
 	if (kmemleak_enabled)
 		make_black_object((unsigned long)phys, true);
-- 
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-27  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-27  3:59 [PATCH 0/3] Some bugfix about kmemleak Liu Shixin
2023-09-27  3:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] bootmem: use kmemleak_free_part_phys in free_bootmem_page/put_page_bootmem Liu Shixin
2023-09-27 16:05   ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-27 17:00   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-27  3:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/kmemleak: fix partially freeing unknown object warning Liu Shixin
2023-09-27 17:06   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-28  1:22     ` Liu Shixin
2023-09-27  3:59 ` Liu Shixin [this message]
2023-09-28  9:27   ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/kmemleak: fix print format of pointer in pr_debug() Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230927035923.1425340-4-liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --to=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox