From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: hughd@google.com, surenb@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, osalvador@suse.de,
aquini@redhat.com, kirill@shutemov.name, rientjes@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: keep VMA walk if both MPOL_MF_STRICT and MPOL_MF_MOVE are specified
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 08:48:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230925084840.af05fefd19a101c71308a8cf@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920223242.3425775-1-yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:32:42 -0700 Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
> When calling mbind() with MPOL_MF_{MOVE|MOVEALL} | MPOL_MF_STRICT,
> kernel should attempt to migrate all existing pages, and return -EIO if
> there is misplaced or unmovable page. Then commit 6f4576e3687b
> ("mempolicy: apply page table walker on queue_pages_range()") messed up
> the return value and didn't break VMA scan early ianymore when MPOL_MF_STRICT
> alone. The return value problem was fixed by commit a7f40cfe3b7a
> ("mm: mempolicy: make mbind() return -EIO when MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified"),
> but it broke the VMA walk early if unmovable page is met, it may cause some
> pages are not migrated as expected.
So I'm thinking that a7f40cfe3b7a is the suitable Fixes: target?
> The code should conceptually do:
>
> if (MPOL_MF_MOVE|MOVEALL)
> scan all vmas
> try to migrate the existing pages
> return success
> else if (MPOL_MF_MOVE* | MPOL_MF_STRICT)
> scan all vmas
> try to migrate the existing pages
> return -EIO if unmovable or migration failed
> else /* MPOL_MF_STRICT alone */
> break early if meets unmovable and don't call mbind_range() at all
> else /* none of those flags */
> check the ranges in test_walk, EFAULT without mbind_range() if discontig.
>
> Fixed the behavior.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-25 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 22:32 Yang Shi
2023-09-20 23:36 ` Yang Shi
2023-09-25 15:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-09-25 17:16 ` Yang Shi
2023-09-27 21:39 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-28 16:38 ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-28 17:35 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230925084840.af05fefd19a101c71308a8cf@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox