From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] hugetlb: perform vmemmap restoration on a list of pages
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:12:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230921011223.GC4065@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2FDB2018-74AE-4514-9B43-01664A8E5DBF@linux.dev>
On 09/20/23 11:03, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Sep 20, 2023, at 10:56, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> wrote:
> >> On Sep 20, 2023, at 04:57, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> On 09/19/23 17:52, Muchun Song wrote:
> >>> On 2023/9/19 07:01, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I still think we should free a non-optimized HugeTLB page if we
> >>> encounter an OOM situation instead of continue to restore
> >>> vemmmap pages. Restoring vmemmmap pages will only aggravate
> >>> the OOM situation. The suitable appraoch is to free a non-optimized
> >>> HugeTLB page to satisfy our allocation of vmemmap pages, what's
> >>> your opinion, Mike?
> >>
> >> I agree.
> >>
> >> As you mentioned previously, this may complicate this code path a bit.
> >> I will rewrite to make this happen.
> >
> > Maybe we could introduced two list passed to update_and_free_pages_bulk (this
> > will be easy for the callers of it), one is for non-optimized huge page,
> > another is optimized one. In update_and_free_pages_bulk, we could first
> > free those non-optimized huge page, and then restore vemmmap pages for
> > those optimized ones, in which case, the code could be simple.
> > hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios() dose not need to add complexity, which
> > still continue to restore vmemmap pages and will stop once we encounter
> > an OOM situation.
I am not sure if passing in optimized and non-optimized lists to
update_and_free_pages_bulk will help much. IIUC, it will almost always
be the case where only one list has entries. Is that mostly accurate?
> BTW, maybe we should try again iff there are some non-optimized huge page
> whose vmemmap pages are restored successfully previously and could be freed
> first, then continue to restore the vmemmap pages of the remaining huge pages.
> I think the retry code could be done in update_and_free_pages_bulk() as well.
I came up with a new routine to handle these ENOMEM returns from
hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios. I 'think' it handles these situations.
Here is an updated version of this patch. Sorry, diff makes it a bit
hard to read.
From b13bdccb01730f995191944769f87d0725c289ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 16:14:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: perform vmemmap restoration on a list of pages
The routine update_and_free_pages_bulk already performs vmemmap
restoration on the list of hugetlb pages in a separate step. In
preparation for more functionality to be added in this step, create a
new routine hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios() that will restore
vmemmap for a list of folios.
This new routine must provide sufficient feedback about errors and
actual restoration performed so that update_and_free_pages_bulk can
perform optimally.
Special care must be taken when encountering a ENOMEM error from
hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios. We want to continue making as much
forward progress as possible. A new routine bulk_vmemmap_restore_enomem
handles this specific situation.
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++
mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h | 11 ++++++
3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 70fedf8682c4..52abe56cf38a 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1834,38 +1834,85 @@ static void update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h, struct folio *folio,
schedule_work(&free_hpage_work);
}
-static void update_and_free_pages_bulk(struct hstate *h, struct list_head *list)
+static void bulk_vmemmap_restore_enomem(struct hstate *h,
+ struct list_head *list,
+ unsigned long restored)
{
struct folio *folio, *t_folio;
- bool clear_dtor = false;
- /*
- * First allocate required vmemmmap (if necessary) for all folios on
- * list. If vmemmap can not be allocated, we can not free folio to
- * lower level allocator, so add back as hugetlb surplus page.
- * add_hugetlb_folio() removes the page from THIS list.
- * Use clear_dtor to note if vmemmap was successfully allocated for
- * ANY page on the list.
- */
- list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, list, lru) {
- if (folio_test_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio)) {
+ if (restored) {
+ /*
+ * On ENOMEM error, free any restored hugetlb pages so that
+ * restore of the entire list can be retried.
+ * The idea is that by freeing hugetlb pages with vmemmap
+ * (those previously restored) we will free up memory so that
+ * we can allocate vmemmap for more hugetlb pages.
+ * We must examine and possibly free EVERY hugetlb page on list
+ * in order to call hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios again.
+ * This is not optimal, but is an error case that should not
+ * happen frequently.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, list, lru)
+ if (!folio_test_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio)) {
+ list_del(&folio->lru);
+ spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+ __clear_hugetlb_destructor(h, folio);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+ update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, false);
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * In the case where vmemmap was not restored for ANY folios,
+ * we loop through them trying to restore individually in the
+ * hope that someone elsewhere may free enough memory.
+ * If unable to restore a page, the hugetlb page is made a
+ * surplus page and removed from the list.
+ * If are able to restore vmemmap for one hugetlb page, we free
+ * it and quit processing the list to retry the bulk operation.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, list, lru)
if (hugetlb_vmemmap_restore(h, &folio->page)) {
spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
add_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, true);
spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
- } else
- clear_dtor = true;
- }
+ } else {
+ list_del(&folio->lru);
+ spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+ __clear_hugetlb_destructor(h, folio);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+ update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, false);
+ break;
+ }
}
+}
+
+static void update_and_free_pages_bulk(struct hstate *h, struct list_head *list)
+{
+ int ret;
+ unsigned long restored;
+ struct folio *folio, *t_folio;
/*
- * If vmemmmap allocation was performed on any folio above, take lock
- * to clear destructor of all folios on list. This avoids the need to
+ * First allocate required vmemmmap (if necessary) for all folios.
+ * Carefully handle ENOMEM errors and free up any available hugetlb
+ * pages in order to make forward progress.
+ */
+retry:
+ ret = hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios(h, list, &restored);
+ if (ret == -ENOMEM) {
+ bulk_vmemmap_restore_enomem(h, list, restored);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If vmemmmap allocation was performed on ANY folio , take lock to
+ * clear destructor of all folios on list. This avoids the need to
* lock/unlock for each individual folio.
* The assumption is vmemmap allocation was performed on all or none
* of the folios on the list. This is true expect in VERY rare cases.
*/
- if (clear_dtor) {
+ if (restored) {
spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
list_for_each_entry(folio, list, lru)
__clear_hugetlb_destructor(h, folio);
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
index 4558b814ffab..cc91edbfb68b 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
@@ -480,6 +480,45 @@ int hugetlb_vmemmap_restore(const struct hstate *h, struct page *head)
return ret;
}
+/**
+ * hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios - restore vmemmap for every folio on the list.
+ * @h: struct hstate.
+ * @folio_list: list of folios.
+ * @restored: Set to number of folios for which vmemmap was restored
+ * successfully if caller passes a non-NULL pointer.
+ *
+ * Return: %0 if vmemmap exists for all folios on the list. If an error is
+ * encountered restoring vmemmap for ANY folio, an error code
+ * will be returned to the caller. It is then the responsibility
+ * of the caller to check the hugetlb vmemmap optimized flag of
+ * each folio to determine if vmemmap was actually restored.
+ * Note that processing is stopped when first error is encountered.
+ */
+int hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios(const struct hstate *h,
+ struct list_head *folio_list,
+ unsigned long *restored)
+{
+ unsigned long num_restored;
+ struct folio *folio;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ num_restored = 0;
+ list_for_each_entry(folio, folio_list, lru) {
+ if (folio_test_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio)) {
+ ret = hugetlb_vmemmap_restore(h, &folio->page);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+ else
+ num_restored++;
+ }
+ }
+
+out:
+ if (*restored)
+ *restored = num_restored;
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* Return true iff a HugeTLB whose vmemmap should and can be optimized. */
static bool vmemmap_should_optimize(const struct hstate *h, const struct page *head)
{
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h
index c512e388dbb4..bb58453c3cc0 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
int hugetlb_vmemmap_restore(const struct hstate *h, struct page *head);
+int hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios(const struct hstate *h,
+ struct list_head *folio_list, unsigned long *restored);
void hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize(const struct hstate *h, struct page *head);
void hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folios(struct hstate *h, struct list_head *folio_list);
@@ -45,6 +47,15 @@ static inline int hugetlb_vmemmap_restore(const struct hstate *h, struct page *h
return 0;
}
+static inline int hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios(const struct hstate *h,
+ struct list_head *folio_list,
+ unsigned long *restored)
+{
+ if (restored)
+ *restored = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize(const struct hstate *h, struct page *head)
{
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-21 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-18 23:01 [PATCH v4 0/8] Batch hugetlb vmemmap modification operations Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] hugetlb: optimize update_and_free_pages_bulk to avoid lock cycles Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] hugetlb: restructure pool allocations Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] hugetlb: perform vmemmap optimization on a list of pages Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19 3:10 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 20:49 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-20 3:05 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] hugetlb: perform vmemmap restoration " Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19 9:52 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 20:57 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-20 2:56 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-20 3:03 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-21 1:12 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2023-09-21 9:31 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-21 9:47 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-21 21:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-22 8:19 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-22 17:01 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-22 17:28 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] hugetlb: batch freeing of vmemmap pages Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19 6:09 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 21:32 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] hugetlb: batch PMD split for bulk vmemmap dedup Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19 6:27 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 8:18 ` Joao Martins
2023-09-19 6:42 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 8:26 ` Joao Martins
2023-09-19 8:41 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 8:55 ` Joao Martins
2023-09-19 8:57 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 15:09 ` Joao Martins
2023-09-20 2:47 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-20 10:39 ` Joao Martins
2023-09-21 1:42 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] hugetlb: batch TLB flushes when freeing vmemmap Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:02 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] hugetlb: batch TLB flushes when restoring vmemmap Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19 6:48 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 21:53 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230921011223.GC4065@monkey \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox