From: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
To: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: shr@devkernel.io, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/ksm: Test case for prctl fork/exec workflow
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:51:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919205158.1897353-3-shr@devkernel.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919205158.1897353-1-shr@devkernel.io>
This adds a new test case to the ksm functional tests to make sure that
the KSM setting is inherited by the child process when doing a
fork/exec.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +
.../selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c | 9 ++++
.../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
index 6a9fc5693145..9ab6aa402544 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
TEST_GEN_PROGS += soft-dirty
endif
+TEST_GEN_PROGS += ksm_fork_exec_child
+
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
CAN_BUILD_X86_64 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_64bit_program.c)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..298439f0d55f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+int main()
+{
+ /* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */
+ int ksm = prctl(68, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ exit(ksm == 1 ? 0 : 1);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
index 901e950f9138..4dc0bb522c07 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
@@ -479,6 +479,53 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void)
ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
}
+static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void)
+{
+ int ret, status;
+ pid_t child_pid;
+
+ ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ if (ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL) {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE not supported\n");
+ return;
+ } else if (ret) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=1 failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ child_pid = fork();
+ if (child_pid == -1) {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("fork() failed\n");
+ return;
+ } else if (child_pid == 0) {
+ char *filename = "./ksm_fork_exec_child";
+ char *argv_for_program[] = { filename, NULL };
+
+ execv(filename, argv_for_program);;
+ } else {
+ if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) > 0) {
+ if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
+ status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
+ if (status) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("KSM not enabled\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("program didn't terminate normally\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
+}
+
static void test_prctl_unmerge(void)
{
const unsigned int size = 2 * MiB;
@@ -536,7 +583,7 @@ static void test_prot_none(void)
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
- unsigned int tests = 7;
+ unsigned int tests = 8;
int err;
#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
@@ -576,6 +623,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
test_prctl();
test_prctl_fork();
+ test_prctl_fork_exec();
test_prctl_unmerge();
err = ksft_get_fail_cnt();
--
2.39.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 20:51 [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/ksm: add fork-exec support for prctl Stefan Roesch
2023-09-19 20:51 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/ksm: support fork/exec " Stefan Roesch
2023-09-20 10:00 ` Carl Klemm
2023-09-20 13:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-20 16:29 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-09-19 20:51 ` Stefan Roesch [this message]
2023-09-20 13:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/ksm: Test case for prctl fork/exec workflow David Hildenbrand
2023-09-20 18:57 ` Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230919205158.1897353-3-shr@devkernel.io \
--to=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox