From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@google.com>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
corbet@lwn.net, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
jannh@google.com, evn@google.com, poprdi@google.com,
jordyzomer@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/slub: add is_slab_addr/is_slab_page helpers
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:55:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309151352.9803BA1@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230915105933.495735-3-matteorizzo@google.com>
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:59:21AM +0000, Matteo Rizzo wrote:
> From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
>
> This is refactoring in preparation for adding two different
> implementations (for SLAB_VIRTUAL enabled and disabled).
>
> virt_to_folio(x) expands to _compound_head(virt_to_page(x)) and
> virt_to_head_page(x) also expands to _compound_head(virt_to_page(x))
>
> so PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res)) should be equivalent to
> is_slab_addr(res).
Perhaps add a note that redundant calls to virt_to_folio() will be
removed in following patches?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Co-developed-by: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/slab.h | 1 +
> kernel/resource.c | 2 +-
> mm/slab.h | 9 +++++++++
> mm/slab_common.c | 5 ++---
> mm/slub.c | 6 +++---
> 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 8228d1276a2f..a2d82010d269 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -793,4 +793,5 @@ int slab_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> #define slab_dead_cpu NULL
> #endif
>
> +#define is_slab_addr(addr) folio_test_slab(virt_to_folio(addr))
> #endif /* _LINUX_SLAB_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index b1763b2fd7ef..c829e5f97292 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void free_resource(struct resource *res)
> * buddy and trying to be smart and reusing them eventually in
> * alloc_resource() overcomplicates resource handling.
> */
> - if (res && PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res)))
> + if (res && is_slab_addr(res))
> kfree(res);
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 799a315695c6..25e41dd6087e 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -169,6 +169,15 @@ static_assert(IS_ALIGNED(offsetof(struct slab, freelist), sizeof(freelist_aba_t)
> */
> #define slab_page(s) folio_page(slab_folio(s), 0)
>
> +/**
> + * is_slab_page - Checks if a page is really a slab page
> + * @s: The slab
> + *
> + * Checks if s points to a slab page.
> + *
> + * Return: true if s points to a slab and false otherwise.
> + */
> +#define is_slab_page(s) folio_test_slab(slab_folio(s))
> /*
> * If network-based swap is enabled, sl*b must keep track of whether pages
> * were allocated from pfmemalloc reserves.
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index e99e821065c3..79102d24f099 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ void kfree(const void *object)
> return;
>
> folio = virt_to_folio(object);
> - if (unlikely(!folio_test_slab(folio))) {
> + if (unlikely(!is_slab_addr(object))) {
> free_large_kmalloc(folio, (void *)object);
> return;
> }
> @@ -1094,8 +1094,7 @@ size_t __ksize(const void *object)
> return 0;
>
> folio = virt_to_folio(object);
> -
> - if (unlikely(!folio_test_slab(folio))) {
> + if (unlikely(!is_slab_addr(object))) {
> if (WARN_ON(folio_size(folio) <= KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE))
> return 0;
> if (WARN_ON(object != folio_address(folio)))
In the above 2 hunks we're doing virt_to_folio() twice, but I see in
patch 4 that these go away.
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index a7dae207c2d2..b69916ab7aa8 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ static int check_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
> {
> int maxobj;
>
> - if (!folio_test_slab(slab_folio(slab))) {
> + if (!is_slab_page(slab)) {
> slab_err(s, slab, "Not a valid slab page");
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ static noinline bool alloc_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
> return true;
>
> bad:
> - if (folio_test_slab(slab_folio(slab))) {
> + if (is_slab_page(slab)) {
> /*
> * If this is a slab page then lets do the best we can
> * to avoid issues in the future. Marking all objects
> @@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ static inline int free_consistency_checks(struct kmem_cache *s,
> return 0;
>
> if (unlikely(s != slab->slab_cache)) {
> - if (!folio_test_slab(slab_folio(slab))) {
> + if (!is_slab_page(slab)) {
> slab_err(s, slab, "Attempt to free object(0x%p) outside of slab",
> object);
> } else if (!slab->slab_cache) {
> --
> 2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
This all looks nice and mechanical. :P
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 10:59 [RFC PATCH 00/14] Prevent cross-cache attacks in the SLUB allocator Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] mm/slub: don't try to dereference invalid freepointers Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 20:50 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-30 11:04 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/slub: add is_slab_addr/is_slab_page helpers Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 20:55 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] mm/slub: move kmem_cache_order_objects to slab.h Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 20:56 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] mm: use virt_to_slab instead of folio_slab Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 20:59 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] mm/slub: create folio_set/clear_slab helpers Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:02 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] mm/slub: pass additional args to alloc_slab_page Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:03 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] mm/slub: pass slab pointer to the freeptr decode helper Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:06 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] security: introduce CONFIG_SLAB_VIRTUAL Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:07 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] mm/slub: add the slab freelists to kmem_cache Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:08 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] x86: Create virtual memory region for SLUB Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:13 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 21:49 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-18 8:54 ` Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] mm/slub: allocate slabs from virtual memory Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:22 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 21:57 ` Dave Hansen
2023-10-11 9:17 ` Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] mm/slub: introduce the deallocated_pages sysfs attribute Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:23 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] mm/slub: sanity-check freepointers Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:26 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-15 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] security: add documentation for SLAB_VIRTUAL Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-15 21:34 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-20 9:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-15 15:19 ` [RFC PATCH 00/14] Prevent cross-cache attacks in the SLUB allocator Dave Hansen
2023-09-15 16:30 ` Lameter, Christopher
2023-09-18 12:08 ` Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-18 17:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-18 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-19 15:48 ` Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-19 16:02 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-19 17:56 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-19 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-19 13:42 ` Matteo Rizzo
2023-09-19 15:56 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-20 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-20 8:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309151352.9803BA1@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=evn@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jordyzomer@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=matteorizzo@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=poprdi@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox