[RFC PATCH v12 09/33] KVM: Drop .on_unlock() mmu_notifier hook

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

Drop the .on_unlock() mmu_notifer hook now that it's no longer used for
notifying arch code that memory has been reclaimed.  Adding .on_unlock()
and invoking it *after* dropping mmu_lock was a terrible idea, as doing so
resulted in .on_lock() and .on_unlock() having divergent and asymmetric
behavior, and set future developers up for failure, i.e. all but asked for
bugs where KVM relied using .on_unlock() to try to run a callback while
holding mmu_lock.

Opportunistically add a lockdep assertion in kvm_mmu_invalidate_end() to
guard against future bugs of this nature.

Reported-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230802203119.GB2021422@ls.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 76d01de7838f..174de2789657 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ static inline struct kvm *mmu_notifier_to_kvm(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
 typedef bool (*gfn_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
 
 typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
-typedef void (*on_unlock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range {
 	/*
@@ -556,7 +555,6 @@ struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range {
 	union kvm_mmu_notifier_arg arg;
 	gfn_handler_t handler;
 	on_lock_fn_t on_lock;
-	on_unlock_fn_t on_unlock;
 	bool flush_on_ret;
 	bool may_block;
 };
@@ -663,11 +661,8 @@ static __always_inline kvm_mn_ret_t __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
 	if (range->flush_on_ret && r.ret)
 		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
 
-	if (r.found_memslot) {
+	if (r.found_memslot)
 		KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
-		if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_unlock))
-			range->on_unlock(kvm);
-	}
 
 	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
 
@@ -687,7 +682,6 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 		.arg		= arg,
 		.handler	= handler,
 		.on_lock	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
-		.on_unlock	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
 		.flush_on_ret	= true,
 		.may_block	= false,
 	};
@@ -706,7 +700,6 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(struct mmu_notifier *mn
 		.end		= end,
 		.handler	= handler,
 		.on_lock	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
-		.on_unlock	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
 		.flush_on_ret	= false,
 		.may_block	= false,
 	};
@@ -811,7 +804,6 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 		.end		= range->end,
 		.handler	= kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range,
 		.on_lock	= kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin,
-		.on_unlock	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
 		.flush_on_ret	= true,
 		.may_block	= mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range),
 	};
@@ -856,6 +848,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 
 void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
+	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
 	/*
 	 * This sequence increase will notify the kvm page fault that
 	 * the page that is going to be mapped in the spte could have
@@ -887,7 +881,6 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 		.end		= range->end,
 		.handler	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
 		.on_lock	= kvm_mmu_invalidate_end,
-		.on_unlock	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
 		.flush_on_ret	= false,
 		.may_block	= mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range),
 	};
-- 
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog