linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	maple-tree@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/main: Clear boot task idle flag
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:51:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913145125.xssion4ygykunzrc@revolver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913135246.GH692@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [230913 09:53]:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:56:47PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> > index ad920fac325c..f74772acf612 100644
> > --- a/init/main.c
> > +++ b/init/main.c
> > @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ noinline void __ref __noreturn rest_init(void)
> >  	 */
> >  	rcu_read_lock();
> >  	tsk = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns);
> > -	tsk->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
> > +	tsk->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY | PF_IDLE;
> >  	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()));
> >  	rcu_read_unlock();
> >  
> 
> Hmm, isn't that pid-1 you're setting PF_IDLE on?

Yes, thanks.  I think that is what Geert is hitting with my patch.

debug __might_resched() in kernel/sched/core.c is failing to return in
that first (complex) if statement.  His report says pid 1 so this is
likely the issue.

> 
> The task becoming idle is 'current' at this point, see the
> cpu_startup_entry() call below.
> 
> Would not something like so be the right thing?
> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 2299a5cfbfb9..802551e0009b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -9269,7 +9269,7 @@ void __init init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu)
>  	 * PF_KTHREAD should already be set at this point; regardless, make it
>  	 * look like a proper per-CPU kthread.
>  	 */
> -	idle->flags |= PF_IDLE | PF_KTHREAD | PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
> +	idle->flags |= PF_KTHREAD | PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;

I am concerned this will alter more than just the current task, which
would mean more modifications later.  There is a comment about it being
called 'more than once' and 'per cpu' so I am hesitant to change the
function itself.

Although I am unsure of the call path.. fork_idle() -> init_idle() I
guess?

>  	kthread_set_per_cpu(idle, cpu);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index 342f58a329f5..5007b25c5bc6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(play_idle_precise);
>  
>  void cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state)
>  {
> +	current->flags |= PF_IDLE;
>  	arch_cpu_idle_prepare();
>  	cpuhp_online_idle(state);
>  	while (1)


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-13 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13  0:56 Liam R. Howlett
2023-09-13 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13 11:28   ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-09-13 13:18     ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-09-13 12:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-13 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13 14:51   ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2023-09-13 16:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13 17:32       ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-09-14  7:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-14 16:05 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230913145125.xssion4ygykunzrc@revolver \
    --to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox